Poster: A snowHead
|
|
|
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
|
Anyone???................................please
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
|
172 min
|
|
|
|
|
You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
|
I'd go for the 172, just because of the surface area of the base lost be the fact that they're twin tips. Maybe not so easy in the park, but miles better in the soft stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
|
Spyderman, Yeah thats what i was thinking, how much harder would a rotation in the park be?
|
|
|
|
|
You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
|
Liam, It's only 5cm at each end in the park, but the extra length will be really worth it everywhere else.
It's worth checking how Scott measure the Punishers to see if they make allowances for the twin tip in their measurements, but I'd say that a total length of head height would be about right, seeing as what you want to do with them. I'm just thinking of the length you'd want to ski a Mission, considering it's the same ski just with a twin tip. So Mission at about your nose height plus the extra for the twin tip, if that makes sense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liam, for someone your ability and size, I think you should be looking at the 182.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spyderman, Thanks for that, have tried a quick search for the dimensions, but dont seem to be able to find anything. I visited EB yesterday and stood them next to me and they are pretty much the same height, therefore if i deduct the tips the surface area will probably be par with my nose height, i reckon the 172 is probably my best bet.
chris, I did look at the 182, which would be awesome for the big mountain stuff, but i reckon i'll be limited on the piste and in the park.
Thanks for the advice guys.
|
|
|
|
|
|