Poster: A snowHead
|
Anecdotally, it has seemed for a while that snowBoarders are more prone to serious accident than skiers but I spoke to someone 'in insurance' recently who confirmed that claims from and in regard to boarders far outstrip those by skiers.
As I think I've mentioned before, my opinion is that a contributing factor to growing accident rates, particularly amongst snowBoarders, is the increasing tendency to just 'do it' with mates rather than go through the traditional route of Ski School for a few years. The less technical nature of snowBoarding and to a lesser degree of carving skis makes it a little easier to excuse oneself out of the traditional route which once gave an instructor opportunity to in-grain an attitude of concern, consideration, respect and healthy wariness of the environment while he taught you how to manipulate your planks. 'Yer mate', on the other hand, might just about get as far as telling you which colour piste is the hardest before zooming off, leaving you to discover the rest for yourself; sometimes people discover it too late
Some people are even going roaming off piste with less than 2 weeks experience on the mountain. Traditionally, by the time you had the technical ability to go there, you would have had many weeks of instruction during which the instructor would have casually, conversationally shared all sorts of little 'gems of knowledge' about how to behave out there.
Overall, I think a larger proportion of people simply have not had the important stuff presented to them. Much of it seems really obvious when you know it, it's just that until someone points it out, you might just not think of it.
e.g. Coming to a halt at the edge of the piste. Giving the rider downhill the right of way. etc.
I've often wondered how we might do something to help address that through snowHeads.
And now, I have a cunning plan but the first thing we need to do is make a quiz
The idea is not to make it some kind of GCSE in mountain craft but simply to raise the bar of awareness regarding how one should behave responsibly on the mountain. There will be no limit to the number of times a person can try it. They can effectively go and seek or even ask for the answers on the forum or via Google if they choose. But by then they'll have encountered those key facts so job done!
It should be aimed at the general skiing public so we're not talking 'specialist' stuff; for example, I'd start with the basic FIS rules of the piste. But there should be some reference to the risks inherent in off-piste skiing too.
Ideally, I'd like to validate it automatically so:
I think the format will be multiple choice with 4 or 5 possible answers per question.
e.g Q) On the Avalanche Risk Scale, at what level do the most deaths occur? A) 1,2,3,4 or 5 (correct=3)
Or, exact answers.
e.g. Q) Name the 2 items of kit that should always accompany an avalanche transceiver A) correct= "Shovel" and "Probe"
In this case we might check for 'Shovel' and perhaps even 'spade' as an alternative, but if someone typed 'digging thing' it would come up wrong unless we pre-allowed for it, which we wouldn't because that would be silly.
I'm looking for suggestions for questions, ideally fairly sensible questions if U can please...
If we do it good, there will be a prize
|
|
|
|
|
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
|
admin, an excellent idea. I totally agree with your perception and while I'm not exactly pleased to hear about any injuries, I'm interested that there is some sort of support for the inference.
thinking hat on....
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
|
So would this be done via some web code or good ol fashioned excel type quiz? I love the idea btw.
|
|
|
|
|
You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
|
Excellent idea, but are the reckless "have a go" brigade members here? Are they the kind who would do such a quiz - how will you sell it so that it attracts their interest?
Just thought - ought there to be a campaign to change the insurance situation, so that cover for boarding, which you imply is more likely to lead to a claim, is dearer rather than all "winter sports" lumped together?
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
|
is the higher rate of boarders injured also at least in part due to more young people taking boarding up as opposed to skiing?as driving stats show its young, usually males, who are the most reckless etc. not that it changes much of whats said above other than as a resposable older boarder i dont want to pay higher insurance...
|
|
|
|
|
You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
|
NewSkier wrote: |
Excellent idea, but are the reckless "have a go" brigade members here? Are they the kind who would do such a quiz - how will you sell it so that it attracts their interest?
Just thought - ought there to be a campaign to change the insurance situation, so that cover for boarding, which you imply is more likely to lead to a claim, is dearer rather than all "winter sports" lumped together? |
That would be a bit of a return to the bad old days when you couldn't board on your ski insurance, or do much of anything else for that matter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boarders v's skiers aside, has no-one any suggestions for questions?
|
|
|
|
|
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
|
This sounds like an excellent initiative. However, I'm inclined to NewSkier's view.
NewSkier wrote: |
Excellent idea, but are the reckless "have a go" brigade members here? Are they the kind who would do such a quiz - how will you sell it so that it attracts their interest? |
Any intiative that results in just one less accident or fatality should be applauded, but I rather suspect that, like many initiatives aimed at the younger or more reckless groups, the view will be that the old fuddy duddies are trying to take the fun away.
|
|
|
|
|
|
NewSkier wrote: |
Excellent idea, but are the reckless "have a go" brigade members here? Are they the kind who would do such a quiz - how will you sell it so that it attracts their interest?
Just thought - ought there to be a campaign to change the insurance situation, so that cover for boarding, which you imply is more likely to lead to a claim, is dearer rather than all "winter sports" lumped together? |
I was arranging some insurance yesterday with snowcard and off piste boarding was in a higher risk cat. and therefore more expensive than off piste skiing.
|
|
|
|
|
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
|
admin, I think this is a great idea personally. As a new boarder I am always after more information from people who have the experience behind them and are willing to pass it on! Maybe this wouldn't get to some people who are disinclined to 'waste time' with listening to things from those who are experienced but I certainly would and I daresay there are many others who would too. Great idea
|
|
|
|
|
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
|
How about a question on what combination of snow/weather conditions mean that avalanches are more likely to happen?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You know it makes sense.
|
Quote: |
how will you sell it so that it attracts their interest? |
Like I said...
Quote: |
If we do it good, there will be a prize |
Quote: |
Any intiative that results in just one less accident or fatality should be applauded, but I rather suspect that, like many initiatives aimed at the younger or more reckless groups, the view will be that the old fuddy duddies are trying to take the fun away |
Exactly, less accidents. And no-ones' going to be ramming anything down anyone's throat, like I said...
Quote: |
If we do it good, there will be a prize |
|
|
|
|
|
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
|
AxsMan, shouldn't there be an option for all of the above
|
|
|
|
|
Poster: A snowHead
|
admin wrote: |
Quote: |
how will you sell it so that it attracts their interest? |
Like I said...
Quote: |
If we do it good, there will be a prize |
Quote: |
Any intiative that results in just one less accident or fatality should be applauded, but I rather suspect that, like many initiatives aimed at the younger or more reckless groups, the view will be that the old fuddy duddies are trying to take the fun away |
Exactly, less accidents. And no-ones' going to be ramming anything down anyone's throat, like I said |
Not trying to p!ss on Ur parade Merely that I remember how I used to react at a certain stage in my life to attempts by the more "mature" to asert their views based upon experience. It's not about "ramming views" down anyone's throat, it is more about the reverse view. How you are perceived in other words by those who believe (often stupidly) that they actually know best.
|
|
|
|
|
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
|
In Switzerland aren't there more avalanche fatalities at 2 due to the scale being slightly different?
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
|
Swirly wrote: |
In Switzerland aren't there more avalanche fatalities at 2 due to the scale being slightly different? |
I don't know but I'd like to know.
Thanks Axsman, that's a start.
|
|
|
|
|
You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
|
I think its a great idea - I shall do it when it is set up - loads I don't know I'm sure!!
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
|
admin, not sure I'd be able to dream up many questions, and I'll more than likely get the answers wrong, but I think it's an excellent idea.
|
|
|
|
|
You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
|
You are traversing a piste in light/moderate "traffic" with another skier/boarder also traversing in the same direction, but at a sharper angle of descent and higher up the slope from you making a collision a real possibility.
a) do you turn to give way to the faster approaching skier/boarder
b) do you continue in the hope that the collsion will not occur
c) do you continue on the basis that the uphill skier has the responsibility to "miss" you
d) do you stop and let the possible forseen incident recede
Last edited by You'll need to Register first of course. on Thu 20-12-07 15:29; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Great idea, will it be on snowHeads or is this something that's going to be used elsewhere admin? After all, this place is a hideout for enthusiasts who are already well motivated or well informed....
I've lost count of the number of seemingly obvious tips I've been given, not just about being safe but other little tricks too (those sharing a ride down with me from the glacier at the PSB will testify to quite how obvious..!) I imagine I'd need a few goes to hit the pass mark...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Hunter, is the other person above or below you?
|
|
|
|
|
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
|
eng_ch, yes perhaps ambiguous - the other person would be above. Will amend.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Hunter, how is it ambiguous? If the other is at a sharper angle of descent and below you there's no chance of a collision is there? Nicely framed question though!
|
|
|
|
|
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
|
David Murdoch, it might be ambiguous to a "novice" I suppose.
|
|
|
|
|
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
|
admin wrote: |
Swirly wrote: |
In Switzerland aren't there more avalanche fatalities at 2 due to the scale being slightly different? |
I don't know but I'd like to know.
Thanks Axsman, that's a start. |
In Switzerland anecdotally they tend to post lower threat levels , in Verbier a large part of the town has to be evacuated at cat 5. The fatalities on the mountain are roughly cat 1 7%, cat 2 30%, cat 3 50%, cat 4 12% , cat 5 0-1% (these are a year old).
The figures are easy to misinterpret as the number of days each cat is posted vary hugely plus the lifts are unlikely to be operating on cat 5 days. I will try and dig out the source, but I am busy getting ready for my trip.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Hunter, How about (e) point your ski sticks at them, works for me
|
|
|
|
|
You know it makes sense.
|
jbob, presuposing that "you" are infact a skier not a boarder
|
|
|
|
|
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
|
Two pistes merge for 100m before separating, a green into a blue. Traffic is moderate and clearly moving faster on the blue section. You are travelling along the green just prior to joining the merged area. Do you
a) stop at the side of the piste to get your bearings
b) slow down and ski/board cautiously onto the the new piste
c) get up to the speed on the faster piste before entering it
d) assess the uphill status for approaching skiers/boarders before entering merged pistes
|
|
|
|
|
Poster: A snowHead
|
Source Swiss federal institute for snow- and avalanche research Davos, SLF http://wa.slf.ch/index.php?id=5333
Swiss Avalanche Fatalities, 2005/2006
(October 1, 2005 - September 30, 2006)
Number of fatalities 2005/2006: 24 people
(11 out-of-bound skiers, 5 out-of-bound snowboarders, 5 backcountry skiers, 0 backcountry snowboarder, 3 snowshoers, 0 icefall climbers,
0 mountaineers, 0 other)
Cat 1 none
cat 2 6
cat 3 17
cat 4 1
cat 5 none
Swiss Avalanche Fatalities, 2006/2007
(October 1, 2006 - September 30, 2007)
Number of fatalities 2006/2007: 15 (plus 6 climbers CAUGHT BY AN AVALANCHE AT 4000M while ascending) people (as of 30.9.2007)
(7 out-of-bound skiers, 0 out-of-bound snowboarders, 7 backcountry skiers, 0 backcountry snowboarder, 0 snowshoers, 0 icefall climbers,
6 mountaineers, 1 other)
Cat 1 none
cat 2 3
cat 3 12
cat 4 NONE
cat 5 none
If your are interested in avalanches there is some very interesting stuff here.
|
|
|
|
|
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
|
jbob, I'm confused again, now. What, in Europe, is the difference between out-of-bounds and back country?
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
|
Hurtle, I dont know the official SLF definition but would assume out of bounds is lift served terrain, and backcountry where participants have ascended at least partly under their own steam.
|
|
|
|
|
You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
|
jbob, oh, OK, that makes sense. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
|
You are skiing down a cat-track (perhaps some explanation of what "cat-track" means?) and a slow skier is ahead of you skiing staedily from one side of the piste to the other.
Should you:
1). Speed up, shout a warning and try to pass the skier as quickly as possible by skiing straight down the middle of the piste
2). Try and pass them on the downhill side of the piste
3). Try and pass them on the uphill side of the piste
4). Slow down to the slower skiers pace and follow them until the piste widens
5). Slow down to the slower skiers pace, click your poles together to make them aware of your presence and pass when and if it becomes safe to do so.
|
|
|
|
|
You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
|
Nick L, yeah, not sure I know what you mean by a cat-track. Also, the nature of the warning could be clarified? Without begging your question, if I ever do consider it's right to warn someone verbally that I'm about to pass them, I try and say which side of them I'm going to go.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nick L wrote: |
You are skiing down a cat-track (perhaps some explanation of what "cat-track" means?) and a slow skier is ahead of you skiing staedily from one side of the piste to the other.
Should you:
1). Speed up, shout a warning and try to pass the skier as quickly as possible by skiing straight down the middle of the piste
2). Try and pass them on the downhill side of the piste
3). Try and pass them on the uphill side of the piste
4). Slow down to the slower skiers pace and follow them until the piste widens
5). Slow down to the slower skiers pace, click your poles together to make them aware of your presence and pass when and if it becomes safe to do so. |
6) zoom up to them at great speed, so that when they fall over through pure fear, you have to huck over them. As practiced by one of my German mates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kramer, sounds like a typically German approach. They drive the same way on the autobahns as well - shooting right up behind you, strafing the back of the car with headlammp flashes and expecting you to get out of the way regardless of what you are overtaking at the time.
BTW - I like the idea of the etiquette quiz, although it may be preaching to the converted for most s.
|
|
|
|
|
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
|
Kramer wrote: |
(6) zoom up to them at great speed, so that when they fall over through pure fear, you have to huck over them. As practiced by one of my German mates. |
Frank? Mad as a box of frogs!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Come, come, chaps, less of the national stereotyping!
|
|
|
|
|
|