Ski Club 2.0 Home
Snow Reports
FAQFAQ

Mail for help.Help!!

Log in to snowHeads to make it MUCH better! Registration's totally free, of course, and makes snowHeads easier to use and to understand, gives better searching, filtering etc. as well as access to 'members only' forums, discounts and deals that U don't even know exist as a 'guest' user. (btw. 50,000+ snowHeads already know all this, making snowHeads the biggest, most active community of snow-heads in the UK, so you'll be in good company)..... When you register, you get our free weekly(-ish) snow report by email. It's rather good and not made up by tourist offices (or people that love the tourist office and want to marry it either)... We don't share your email address with anyone and we never send out any of those cheesy 'message from our partners' emails either. Anyway, snowHeads really is MUCH better when you're logged in - not least because you get to post your own messages complaining about things that annoy you like perhaps this banner which, incidentally, disappears when you log in :-)
Username:-
 Password:
Remember me:
👁 durr, I forgot...
Or: Register
(to be a proper snow-head, all official-like!)

Electric Vehicle route to the alps

 Poster: A snowHead
Poster: A snowHead
kitenski wrote:
@Judwin, thanks, but none of that answers any of my 2 questions?? I am well aware of charging curves!


The published max charge rate for the Model3 is 250Kw - and the graphs show it can only take that up to (about) 20% charge. So no it can't take 350Kw even in the narrow (5-20%) charge window where it can take 250Kw.

No idea on the heat pump.
latest report
 Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
To achieve 350kW an Ionity charger is pushing out 800v, which (unless I've misunderstood Tesla charging), a Tesla can't accept.

I'm not sure what the max amps is at 400v for an ionity, but its possible that, for charging a Tesla, a 350kW ionity will be slower than a 250kW Tesla charger since the latter kicks out a higher current.
ski holidays
 Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Porsche Taycan, Hyundai Ioniq 5 and 6 are the cars I know that have 800v. Nominally if all the stars align (battery temp, low starting SoC, no sharing of power across the chargers) then the Ionity will give my ioniq 5 a full beans 225kw. It then has quite a deep charging curve (much deeper than tesla) that will keep it charging pretty hard up to and beyond 80%.

Reality is you don't see that often, but in summer the rapid DC charging was v quick - quick toilet/buy sandwich and you're done. In winter it is slower (I don't have the pre heating pack) and rarely seeing much over 100kw but I think that is often the Ionity chargers throttling as all other cars at the station are 50-90 max. As long as it's higher than about 65KW when required out and about I can still live with that as I mostly charge at home.

You would really want it to be hitting the big speeds on a road trip to the alps though so agree a big diesel is still the perfect tool for these winter trips - unless you have v good pre-heating on the battery pack.


Last edited by Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see? on Tue 28-02-23 10:20; edited 1 time in total
latest report
 You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
Porsche engineering delivers. The upcoming electric Macan is supposed to “split” the battery in 400v depending on chargers for faster charge.


http://youtube.com/v/hfD7M7iTWRQ
latest report
 Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
The last few posts prompted me to look in a bit more detail at charging curves. I was surprised at how the ultra rapid (100 KW+) charging rates seem to only apply for a fairly small range. Based on these Tesla Model 3 figures , it looks like you only get max rate up to maybe 20%, then after ~50% you're probably below 100 KW.

As an owner of a Hyundai Kona (Max official rate 75 KW, though I've seen it get to 82 KW), this makes me feel less jealous, as it can maintain 75KW up to 73% charge. On long range trips (that need multiple charges), we typically stop to recharge from 20-30% to 70-80%, which is a stop for 25 to 30 minutes for every 2 hours driving. Based on the model 3 charging curve, it looks like it would be no more than 5 minutes faster for this type of stop, despite having a max charge rate of 250KW v. 75 KW
latest report
 You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
@Viv yes it will be interesting to see some degradation stats in a few years but I suspect what you've described - Hyundai allowing the BMS to charge at higher speeds for longer than Tesla is a symptom of Tesla having to be conservative to offset the fact that they make/display more of the battery pack to be available - smaller buffer. This lets them advertise and display a higher range for a lower number of battery cells (cost!).

I'd rather have the Hyundai approach of increased charging speed all the way through to 80-85% that is useful every fast charge you do, rather than a headline additional 30-40 miles of range. the realistic 230-250 mine delivers is more than enough before needing a loo stop plus really fast DC charge back to 80%.
snow report
 Then you can post your own questions or snow reports...
Then you can post your own questions or snow reports...
kitenski wrote:
@iainm, Does the 2019 M3 have a heatpump? Also interested in why she thinks Ionity would be much faster? Surely it will depend on the chargers surely? ie a 250kw Tesla charger will be faster than a 150kw one, and Ionity go to 350kw but can the Tesla M3 accept that charge rate?

I wasn't too sure about that either, but I've not tried ours on a Ionity.
snow report



Terms and conditions  Privacy Policy