Poster: A snowHead
|
|
|
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
|
I've no idea, but I have some nice skis I'm willing to sell you and a few discount codes that will help you in your research...
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
|
halfhand, From what you say it sounds like you have no issues whatsoever. Time to worry is when you start referring to your collection of planks as "a quiver" and then line them up in height or phatness order and photograph them for all to admire. All snowHeads that do this have wooden floors and white walls - either that or they all live together.
|
|
|
|
|
You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
|
halfhand, oh dear, do you have a garage or attic with some space in it? Worse do you have children? I'm not at all sure how many skis we have.
Me; 3 pairs telemark skis (but bindings only on 2 of these), 1 pair alpine, Mrs Ed: 1 pair alpine 1 pair spare, Ed Maximus: 1 pair telemark, 1 pair alpine, Ed Major 1 pair alpine 1 pair ready for telemark bindings, Ed Minor- 1 pair and one to grow into (oh dear that's 12 pairs of skis). Then there's boots…….lots of boots…everywhere..
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
|
|
|
You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
|
Bode Swiller, it's one person posting from multiple accounts to save embarrassment... probably Arno.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formula for optimum number of toys (skis, guitars, boats, planes etc) is n+1 where n is the number of toys you have
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just did a little mental maths . . . not gonna post the result
|
|
|
|
|
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
|
hobbiteater wrote: |
Formula for optimum number of toys (skis, guitars, boats, planes etc) is n+1 where n is the number of toys you have |
It's actually an inequality, where n(actual) > n(wife's belief of how many pairs one has)
And of course n (optimum) > n(needed) > n(owned), always ensuring that n(needed) contains a minimum factor of safety of 1.5, and that n must be an integer.
It is a similar situation with bikes
|
|
|
|
|
|
see my signature
|
|
|
|
|
|