Poster: A snowHead
|
flowa, me too
|
|
|
|
|
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
|
Over 150 post from one poster, mainly deleted, so not really 670 , as they have gone and the bulk of the rest about the poster. Least interesting thread on here.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
|
Actually that's a bit harsh, as you have about 50 threads nobody even bothered answering.
|
|
|
|
|
You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
|
Comedy Goldsmith, You're confusing personal with important.
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
|
The SCGB 'Chat Forum Usage Guidelines' and 'Chat Forum terms and conditions' are worth a browse ...
http://www.skiclub.co.uk/skiclub/membersonly/snowtalk/guidelines.aspx#communicationwithskiclub
... if you have a spare few minutes. Here are some highlights:
Quote: |
Excessive posting
Take care not to dominate the forum. Only post as frequently as others do. The limit for each member is 4% of the total post count within any 24 hour period. Exceed this limit and will be contacted in regards to your over usage. |
As above, this is being monitored. One SCGB director contributed almost 20% of posts on 16 January (i.e. five times the permitted limit) so there really needs to be a clamp-down.
Quote: |
Be generally nice to each other ... |
A worthy objective, which we so rarely see on ski forums.
Quote: |
Rants and raves targeting particular groups of people, such as skiers, boarders, seasonnaires, men, women ect are not allowed. |
All very good, and what about the French?
Quote: |
Duplicate IDs for the sake of posting a joke or a troll are not permitted. |
Excellent
Quote: |
Certain posts are liable for deletion. These posts include ... Posts written entirely in a language other than English. |
Such as French
Quote: |
Certain posts are liable for deletion. These posts include ... Clear cases of spam - eg. viagra, cialis ... |
What is cialis (he says, innocently)?
Quote: |
Users must not post or transmit statements that are intentionally false or misleading. |
An interesting stipulation. More about that later.
|
|
|
|
|
You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
|
Comedy Goldsmith, we dont give a chuff
|
|
|
|
|
|
Smokin Joe, is that the royal 'we'? I'm tempted - purely to enjoy the pun, of course - to say, 'pis$ off then'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If I was a paid up member, i might give a toss. I'm not, so I don't, and it's not worth even the amount of time I took to type this reply.
Took a while for T+C's to be mentioned though.
anyway... :yawn smiley:
|
|
|
|
|
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
|
Quote: |
The SCGB 'Chat Forum Usage Guidelines' and 'Chat Forum terms and conditions' are worth a browse ...
|
They so are not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Smokin Joe, andy, Lizzard, WHY do you keep coming back to this thread? Why don't you stop doing it and/or put him on 'ignore'? Your remarks are appreciably more pointless than his posts.
|
|
|
|
|
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
|
andy wrote: |
Took a while for T+C's to be mentioned though. |
|
|
|
|
|
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
|
Smokin Joe wrote: |
Comedy Goldsmith, we dont give a chuff |
"We"
We have royalty in our midst
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pedantica wrote: |
Smokin Joe, andy, Lizzard, WHY do you keep coming back to this thread? Why don't you stop doing it and/or put him on 'ignore'? Your remarks are appreciably more pointless than his posts. |
I agree...
After all, it's not like anyoneother than Megamum goes to every topic they're not interested in just to say so.
|
|
|
|
|
You know it makes sense.
|
Lizzard wrote: |
Quote: |
The SCGB 'Chat Forum Usage Guidelines' and 'Chat Forum terms and conditions' are worth a browse ...
|
They so are not. |
That's an odd thing to say, because you posted several times to the SCGB forum on condition of all those guidelines and conditions (including the 4% one which made the postings illegal). By posting, you either directly agreed those conditions/rules or endorsed them by implication.
It's no good advising people not to read stuff that may affect them.
We've really got to get sensible around here.
|
|
|
|
|
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
|
Pedantica wrote: |
Smokin Joe, andy, Lizzard, WHY do you keep coming back to this thread? Why don't you stop doing it and/or put him on 'ignore'? Your remarks are appreciably more pointless than his posts. |
Yup - this.
Almost as fixated as the person they are claiming is a tad fixated.
|
|
|
|
|
Poster: A snowHead
|
I predict that the SCGB forum will go MO again.
|
|
|
|
|
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
|
Chasseur, are you sure you're not fixated about fixated people fixating about other fixated people?
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
|
And my worry is that this thread will go 'morons only'.
|
|
|
|
|
You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
|
|
|
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
|
Pedantica, cause I want to and it's a free country
|
|
|
|
|
You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
|
Bode Swiller, well given it's activity level with an 'open' policy . . . "forum" is an oxymoron . . .
|
|
|
|
|
|
Smokin Joe, Absolutely -- train-crash; does this make Admin the Thin Controller ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
I stayed away from this thread for a couple of weeks. Sadly I see it is still going. Ah well, here is a bucket full of petrol to throw on the flames.
It is not illegal to post more than 4% of posts on the TeaClub forum. It may be contrary to their rules - and that is a matter entirely for members (such as myself) to decide whether or not they want to enforce that rule - but is absolutely 100% (not 4%) irrelevant to anyone else, or anyone else. If it were really illegal, then it would be simple to sort it out - just report it to your local police force and see how much interest they take in the matter
|
|
|
|
|
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
|
JohnHSmith, "illegal" just means contrary to or forbidden by official rules, regulations, etc. A chess player can make an illegal move but nobody calls the cops.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: |
By posting, you either directly agreed those conditions/rules or endorsed them by implication.
|
And I might quite easily break them at any moment. Scary innit?
|
|
|
|
|
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
|
Bode Swiller, being pedantic, illegal means against the law. Common usage allows it to be used as against the rules but that's not what it means and that usage irritates me. Tell me, how did Pedantica get that name.......
|
|
|
|
|
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
|
JohnHPedant, my dictionary, written by very clever people, disagrees with you.
I would take issue with your "bucket full of petrol", it was more like a teaspoon of Night Nurse. Anyway, in line with your suggestion, I'm about to call the Police. Back soon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
snowHeads ski club 2.0 is the friendliest ski club ever.......
Come on people.....keep it friendly !
|
|
|
|
|
You know it makes sense.
|
JohnHSmith, blimey you were right, they weren't interested. So people exceeding the daily 4% limit can continue in the knowledge that they are highly unlikely to be proscecuted.
|
|
|
|
|
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
|
Lizzard wrote: |
Quote: |
By posting, you either directly agreed those conditions/rules or endorsed them by implication.
|
And I might quite easily break them at any moment. Scary innit? |
Anarchist!
|
|
|
|
|
Poster: A snowHead
|
Bode Swiller wrote: |
JohnHSmith, blimey you were right, they weren't interested. So people exceeding the daily 4% limit can continue in the knowledge that they are highly unlikely to be proscecuted. |
It's an outrage!
If the authorities wont take responsibility, I wouldn't be surprised if someone doesn't go start a vigilante squad to fix it?
|
|
|
|
|
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
|
Bode Swiller wrote: |
JohnHPedant, my dictionary, written by very clever people, disagrees with you.
I would take issue with your "bucket full of petrol", it was more like a teaspoon of Night Nurse. Anyway, in line with your suggestion, I'm about to call the Police. Back soon. |
JohnHSmith,
Quote: |
Common usage allows it to be used...and that usage irritates me.
|
How unfortunate for you.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
|
Happily I am perfect in every way and therefore able to keep everything in perspective. Especially as I am safely back from a wonderful day out around Maria Alm /Dienten and feeling smug
|
|
|
|
|
You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
|
Fevered discussion over the '4% rule' on the SCGB forum yesterday ...
SCGB Chat Forum wrote: |
Ian W Smith
"It seems the 4% daily post rule limit has been deleted (or I can't find it any more)?
If so that is very sensible.
Thank you, SCGB Forum Admins.
EDIT - above is incorrect - see below - sorry"
Janet Nettleship
"As far as I can see it's sadly still there in the rules Ian."
Ian W Smith
"Janet Nettleship: Yes sorry - just found it again - but it cannot be enforced until we reach 25 or more total posts per day across all the forums. Until then everyone of us is in breach by making even 1 post.
I have no wish to dominate anything but we do need more active posters to liven up things. Hope what I am contributing is OK with the powers that be."
Gerry Aitken
"Ian W Smith: the 4% has put its coat on and will be leaving very shortly." |
... and it's still there this morning. We'll keep you closely informed of any BREAKING NEWS or additional BREAKING 4% RULE NEWS.
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
|
Comedy Goldsmith, cold towel please for my fevered brow.
Dunno how I missed the thing - must get to SpecSavers
|
|
|
|
|
You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
|
But it may be that the 4% rule would never have put its coat on without you. Congratulations. What the SCGB clearly needs is more influence from people sheltering in family-ruled Arab states.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: |
What the SCGB clearly needs is more influence from people sweltering in family-ruled Arab states. |
FIFY
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting to see that Gerry Aitken still has influence at the SCGB.
Quote: |
Gerry Aitken
"Ian W Smith: the 4% has put its coat on and will be leaving very shortly."
|
|
|
|
|
|
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
|
2000-3000 extra page views in the last week... on a thread that's been inactive for most of that? Who the heck is hitting refresh over and over and over... ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
andy wrote: |
Who the heck is hitting refresh over and over and over... ? |
I can only think of one candidate
Robo-admin wrote: |
Robo-admin
super-snowHead
Posts: 16777136
Location: The internet |
|
|
|
|
|
|