Poster: A snowHead
|
I found this article by Dave Siegel, written back in 1997. He describes a method by which, he claims, you can learn to ski any groomed terrain in 4 days.
Day 1: Learn edge control on ice skates.
Day 2: Learn to hockey stop on ice skates.
Day 3: Learn to effectively side slip on steep groomed terrain. (No turning).
Day 4: Finally learn to turn on skis.
He places a lot of emphasis on teaching edge control and forward shin pressure.
http://hs34.order-vault.net/~admin160/diary/jan.23.97.html (Part I)
http://hs34.order-vault.net/~admin160/diary/jan.30.97.html (Part II)
I'm inclined to think that this might actually work for pretty athletic people.
What do you think?
(This is a repost of the same message I posted on forum.ski.com.au)
Last edited by Poster: A snowHead on Fri 15-12-06 18:35; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
|
Well, I haven't followed through on your links- but younger son learned very quickly with ski-evolutif at Les Arcs (do they still teach that?) even though most of his classes were in French
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
|
isusanin - welcome to snowHeads!
Yes, there are two distinct approaches to teaching skiing from scratch:
1. Via the conventional snowplough, snowplough turn.
2. Direct to parallel
I used to teach (1) primarily, but did a bit of experimentation with ski evolutif - as Nick mentions - very short skis, skidded parallel turns. It short-circuits the process, but has its own drawbacks.
It works fine, but the scary thing for beginners tends to be entering and crossing the fall-line. That's one reason why the snowplough turn endures - it limits speed constantly. And the snowplough is a valuable technique in skiing anyway.
Modern skis achieve very rapid progress via the snowplough to achieve parallel skiing, so the time advantage of ski evolutif isn't that great anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
|
I'm not sure how up to date this is. I can't imagine going as a beginner to a steepish slope and expecting to side-slip it. I find that carving skis are harder to side slip than the old long planks, as you tend to catch the edges more.
If they want to spend a day falling onto their hands/butt/head then they should start boardin'!
The assertion that 2/3rds of instructors are not very good skiers is a bit OTT IMHO. He also seems to live in an ideal world where, as a novice, you take a chair up to the top of a steep groomed run "without any moguls" and side slip down. What planet does this guy live on? Maybe in the US there is such a thing as a steep mogul free run, but there is a danger in having read those instructions, a bad experience will put you off for life.
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
|
Nick Zotov wrote: |
Well, I haven't followed through on your links- but younger son learned very quickly with ski-evolutif at Les Arcs (do they still teach that?) even though most of his classes were in French |
Funnily enough I was in Les Arcs earlier this week and I asked whether they still learn using Evolutif. The answer was an emphatic non !
Shame - I learnt that way in Arc 2000 a decade or more ago. It was a fantastic way to learn as it tought 'proper' skiing skills (parallel skis, edging, side slipping etc) from the start and allowed us as complete beginners to get all over the mountain in a way which would probably not have been possible using the old 'snowplough/stem christie' method.
Probably not for everyone, but I enjoyed it.
d
|
|
|
|
|
You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
|
That's interesting, pendodave. I wasn't aware that it had been dropped. I wonder when this occurred.
It's also interesting that you have such a positive memory of learning by that method. Even back in 1975 I was being trained as an instructor in carved snowplough turn technique by Ali Ross. BASI didn't recognise ski evolutif/graduated length method at all.
In my view it's good to have competing teaching methods. The world's big enough to accommodate different ideas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Goldsmith wrote: |
It's also interesting that you have such a positive memory of learning by that method. |
I'm slightly embarrassed to say that I think it was all in the mind.
When I was planning my first ski trip, I was really keen to get skiing as soon as possible. A friend of mine lent me a video which was made by Peter Stuyvesant (sp) and based in La Plagne (rather than Les Arcs). It was all about a group of beginners learning using Ski Evolutif. They were haring all over the place in no time, so it looked just the thing...
I already believed in the system before I got there, so having convinced myself it was going to work it was probably no surprise that it did.
It was all about self-hypnosis really. Kind of alternative therapy for skiing.
Mind you, a few years later when I first ventured out into some particularly cruddy off-piste, I had to get to grips with the old stem-christies pretty darned quickly !!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pardon my ignorance, but what is a "stem christie"?
|
|
|
|
|
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
|
|
|
|
Peter Leuzzi wrote: |
Pardon my ignorance, but what is a "stem christie"? |
This is the turn taught as an intermediate link between snowplow and parralel. The turn begins as a snowplow and after the new downhill ski has crossed the fall line, the up hill ski is brought in parallel.
While many see it as a transitional turn used when learning, it is also a very effective turn to be used in crud, breakable crust etc. It works well because it keeps the weight spread on 2 skiis while giving a wide base to help stability.
|
|
|
|
|
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
|
|
|
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
|
Guys,
What's your take on learning edge control by learning to hockey stop on ice skates, as the author of the article suggests. How many of you can actually do a hockey stop on ice, and if you can, how does the skill translate to skiing?
The reason I'm asking is because I'm a beginner, and wonder if learning to parallel/hockey stop on ice skates will help me get better on skis.
Thanks,
And yeah, I'm new here
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You know it makes sense.
|
pendodave, hubby and I learnt using evolutif in Flaine in 1995, we got on very well with it too, and friends were amazed at our progress.
|
|
|
|
|
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
|
manifest, Welcome to
I'm not a teacher but I can't see anything wrong with a hockey stop ... To do so would mean that you unweight the edges and throw them around... Sounds quite useful to me as a methods of stopping and is want most people do when stopping quickly
|
|
|
|
|
Poster: A snowHead
|
I played ice hockey 2-5 days/week every winter from the ages of 7 to 18, and I don't think it was a particularly large help with learning to ski. Skating and skiing are extremely different - besides the obvious of different surface, inclined vs flat, etc. there is also the very significant point that when on ice skates you're on a single contact point, whereas on skiis you're on a roughly 5 foot edge. In my opinion you will learn much more regarding skiing in 2 days on skiis than in 2 days on skates.
Also, who is really going to learn edge control on skates after just one day on skates?
|
|
|
|
|
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
|
manifest, I can hockey stop, I used to skate pretty regularly - wouldn't say it helps particularly with skiing, except in general balance terms...Personally I'd stick with the traditional method of learning via plough/christie - seems to me to stand you in better stead for learning to deal with steeps, and carving...
aj xx
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
|
easiski wrote: |
The main problem I saw with the system (have used it myself on occasions), was that they encouraged rotation, which later had to be unlearnt. |
Just a quick question - where does the arm/hand movement or steering become a problem of rotation (which i presume is where the shoulders and upper body swing around). More specifically, is there a drill to discourage over rotation?
|
|
|
|
|
You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
|
I did hear from one instructor that if you skip the wedge stage, you'll have to eventually go back and learn it, but I didn't get the reason why. How exactly does plough/christie help prepare you for dealing with steeps and carving?
From what I've been reading, it seems that the parallel slides (side-slips) are important for steeps, and you can't even dream of carving in the plough position. Is this wrong?
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
|
Hywel, in brief, if your upper body is turning as you do then you suffer from a problem with rotation, especially if you are turning your upper body to initiate the turn. The ideal that you should be aiming for is that your shoulders should be aiming down the fall line at all times. The drill that I've always been taught is to hold your poles parallel in front of your body at arms length and keep them facing down the fall line as you ski down the slope. Start on easier slopes, and gradually move up.
|
|
|
|
|
You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
|
I tend to get down narrow, steep bits of off-piste using a wedge and side-slipping alternately.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kramer, I noticed that my outside/downhill ski tends to be ahead of the inside ski, which is the opposite of most (non-telemark) skiers that I watched going down the slope. Could it be a sign that I'm overrotating? Since I went skiing only twice in my life, I want to make sure I'm not developing some bad habits...
|
|
|
|
|
|
I must say I'm intrigued by methods of learning to ski that don't progress from plough through stem. The ski evolutif and "international parallel technique" methods are old examples, but it has surprised me that with blades and carving skis etc there haven't been more concerted attempts to popularize systems that teach parallel carving without going through the traditional progression. I am in no doubt in my own mind that having to progress from some kind of wedge has been a problem in my own skiing, though I'm equally convinced that the situations where some kind of wedge technique is useful are both common and diverse.
|
|
|
|
|
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
|
manifest, firstly I have to say that I'm not an instructor, so that should qualify my answer somewhat. My understanding is that if your downhill ski is in front of your uphill ski then there is something wrong with your stance as it would mean that your hips are facing across the mountain, rather than down the fall line as they should be. I'm not sure what to do to rectify this.
slikedges, surely these days we have blades to make it easier for people to learn to parallel carve if they can't do it on skis?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kramer, if your shoulders face down the fall line at all times you will have great difficulty in steering a turn to completion (i.e. maybe even back up the slope). That "old school" face down the valley stuff tends to be a little restrictive/prescriptive.
isusanin, carving snowploughs are a useful way to learn the feel of what an edged ski will do, as long as you make sure that only 1 ski is carving at a time.
manifest, can you be a bit more specific about where in the turn your outside ski is in front of your inside ski?
|
|
|
|
|
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
|
Alan Craggs, point taken.
|
|
|
|
|
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
|
Does anyone know anything about the copyright aspect of old videos that are no longer available, makers defunct etc.? I could post a couple of clips from "Ski the French Way" but I wouldn't want to upset any followers of Peter Stuyvesant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just been sking red runs today with 2 of my kids - 13 and 16- they can handle steep(ish) stuff with confidence and can stop on their edges "scater" style. Both can handle inlne skates well the older uses them daily on his paper round and his overall edge control is good. This is after just 1 week of intermediate lessons.
What they can't do yet is convert this into the kind of stylish carving quick turn skiing of the locals. I guess that is a matter of time.
Boyo
|
|
|
|
|
You know it makes sense.
|
Kramer, yes, but I would've thought some enterprising person would've seen the convergence (longer blades/shorter skis) and tried to put together a system for beginners using say 120cm blades starting with parallels on gentle slopes and ploughing only to stop.
|
|
|
|
|
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
|
|
|
Poster: A snowHead
|
ajhainey, I think my downhill shoulder also comes forward, so I guess it's a problem with not facing downhill while turning. I guess the hips should not rotate either, right? I'm puzzled as to why my instructor never pointed this out to me. The only thing I was told to do is to keep my hands in front to ensure forward balance.
|
|
|
|
|
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
|
manifest, again a lesson is what you need, different types of turns will have differing body reactions to balance, but generally the feet lead the body into a turn.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
|
|
|
You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
|
p.s manifest - almost everyone turns like this to begin with btw (overrotating and ending up with hips/shoulders uhill) so don't worry too much! In fact if you catch most average 'holiday' intermediates(like me ) on a slope where they are a little out of their depth you'll see them do much the same thing - swing a shoulder uphill a bit or sort of 'drop' it in towards the hill as they find their balance at the end of a turn - I know I do it when turning left sometimes...More time and more lessons is the answer - just wanted to point out it is a normal stage to go through!
Last edited by You need to Login to know who's really who. on Sun 5-02-06 3:24; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
|
ajhainey, this is my first winter skiing. I went a couple of times so far and can go down any green run using both the wedge and parallel turns. My technique is obviously bad, and I can feel it. I will soon be going on a 4-day ski trip, and just wanted to see what I can do to improve. I had 2 group lessons and I felt the second one was particularly useless (athough the first one was very informative). Due to a tight budget, I won't be taking any more lessons in the near future, so your tips are very handy
|
|
|
|
|
You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
|
I have just come back and took a week of group ski lessons.
We were taught the traditional Snowplough start and then progressed to stem christie (thats not what they called it but the description fits) and then moved on to parallel turns.
The only thing I found annoying about it was they start by telling you something and then end up contradicting it when they teach you the next step. I honestly wish we had progressed more quickly to parallel turns because I found it easier. The only people who didn't were those who were nervous about going faster, but as long as you can get over that it is a lot less hard work.
I think the point about learning from Ice Skating is interesting. I skated on Hockey boots a lot when I was younger and found that a lot of the techniques that I learnt from that I was able to apply to skiing, so much so that I progressed a lot more quickly than the other people in my lessons, but only when we had progressed to parallel skiing.
manifest, My tip to you is that the most useful thing I was told is remember to make it flow. If your turns don't flow it won't feel comfortable and you won't gain confidence and in my mind, skiing is all about confidence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
kosciosco, the snowplough is an excellent backstop in tricky situations, so it's not really a case of "contradicting" or unlearning. It's just that you need more than one tool in your locker. Sounds like you had a good time - are you hooked?
|
|
|
|
|
|
kosciosco, just saw you're other thread - welcome to the club of ski-obsessives!
|
|
|
|
|
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
|
laundryman, Thanks for the welcome.
I understand what you are saying about the snowplough. It wasn't that which was a contradiction so much as the amount of movement in the body - when you start they teach you to be quite stiff, as you progress you learn to become more flexible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
IMO if you felt that there was any "contradiction" involved when "progressing" from plough to parallel then either they were saying/doing the wrong things or they were just not very good at explaining it to you. Also IMO nobody is "taught" to be stiff - but it is unusual to find beginners who can be loose and flexible. "Stiffness" tends to be one of the biggest hurdles on the "intermediate plateau" in my experience. I would agree that many demonstrations of technique look "stiff", which may give the observer the unfortunate false idea that they should emulate the "stiffness".
|
|
|
|
|
|