Poster: A snowHead
|
|
|
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
|
better going a bit too big than a bit too small because they do not bend easily! my only concern would be if you had one of the toe pieces with no metal in the crampon fitting - i think you only get this on the TLT Speed these days
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
|
Thanks Arno, that's very reassuring (me = FT12) so I'll order the larger size.
Cheers
|
|
|
|
|
You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
|
|
|
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
|
I use the Dynafit 100mm crampons on a 92mm waist ski on Radical ST bindings... I've had no problems yet, though admittedly I haven't needed to use them that often.
|
|
|
|
|
You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
moffatross, I would prob go with the 100s as a 92mm waist = probably slightly wider where the crampons sit. I have used the 92/88mm size on skis with 89mm waist and they were 'snug'. Saying that, I personelly wouldn't want more than a 5mm gap either side of the ski to the crampon...
|
|
|
|
|
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
|
offpisteskiing wrote: |
I personelly wouldn't want more than a 5mm gap either side of the ski to the crampon... |
Between Dynafit's own crampons and the ones offered by B&D most of the ski sizes you'd actually want to fit crampons to (and a few you might not) should be covered to within a few mm of overlap. I have a pair of (as yet, quite unused) B&D crampons; they're not as nicely made as Dynafit's own, however.
|
|
|
|
|
|