Poster: A snowHead
|
|
|
cran
cran
Guest
|
It helps if it's higher at the top than at the bottom...
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
|
|
|
You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
|
It depends when we're going. Our holidays tend to be early and late in the season due to school holidays. Christmas and Easter school holidays we aim for. As a result we try to go fairly high if going to France, especially at Christmas (not such a problem for Easter school hols). We did go to Ellmau a couple of Christmases ago which is about 700m, but snow was a bit dodgy down to town.
Amusingly this Christmas I suggested we go to Tignes. The OH is a bit of a wimp and said, "oh no, Tignes is really high so can get really cold at Christmas, I'll not be able to handle it". So we're going to Cervinia instead, which is just as high, just that the OH hasn't been there and got cold there previously.
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
|
You need atleast 200km of runs for a week's vacation. 100km for a weekend.
In the Western European Alps, the minimum village height is 1800m in Nov / May, 1500m in Dec / Mar / Apr, 800m in Jan / Feb.
If you are buying property, the minimum height to evade longterm global warming is 2000m.
|
|
|
|
|
You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
|
3,500m. Otherwise it isn't worth going.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Don't think I could put forward a better remark than Whitegold above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
saikee wrote: |
Don't think I could put forward a better remark than Whitegold above. |
You'll be missing out on Stuben then. Good luck finding more snow in Europe...
|
|
|
|
|
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
|
Also there are plenty fo factors that are way more important than altitude if you want cold/snow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whitegold wrote: |
If you are buying property, the minimum height to evade longterm global warming is 2000m. |
So that's Tignes or Val Thorens or .....
|
|
|
|
|
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
|
At night I would prefer to be at sea level, just to be able to get a good nights sleep(as that never happens at altitude)
|
|
|
|
|
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
|
clarky999 wrote: |
saikee wrote: |
Don't think I could put forward a better remark than Whitegold above. |
You'll be missing out on Stuben then. Good luck finding more snow in Europe... |
True. But I'm more than happy for folk to miss out Stuben. There's nothing to see there folks, just move along
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personally I like to ski resorts where I can avoid people with 'altitude attitude' - you know, the 'we only stay in the highest resorts in europe because nowhere else is snow sure even in Janaury' attitude..
|
|
|
|
|
You know it makes sense.
|
Nobody yet seems to have said that the snow line is lower the further East you go in the Alps. Thus Austrian resorts can be lower than French ones.
|
|
|
|
|
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
|
I think most of the Austrian resorts I have been to are around 700m, but the ski areas go much higher than that as the villages are normally based on the valley floor. Altitude is less of an issue on the eastern side of the Alps. I have had both terrible snow conditions in La Plagne (1800m) and Pas De La Casa (2100m) and fantastic snow conditions in Kitzbühel (760m) all the same week in March. There are no guarantees with weather. Altitude is only a small part of the story.
|
|
|
|
|
Poster: A snowHead
|
Anything below 1000m in the Alps feels like a hill.
Hills are for beginners and oldies.
|
|
|
|
|
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
|
Whitegold wrote: |
Anything below 1000m in the Alps feels like a hill.
Hills are for beginners and oldies. |
1000m? Like Chamonix you mean? Or Engelberg?
Last edited by Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person on Thu 15-12-11 20:59; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
|
Cham is at 1035m.
Engelberg is at 1015m.
|
|
|
|
|
You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
|
Whitegold wrote: |
Cham is at 1035m.
Engelberg is at 1015m. |
Right, so the extra 35m makes a difference does it?
You're just wrong. Admit it.
The altitude of where you sleep is not the important factor, it's where the lifts go and what the terrain is.
Whistler is at just over 600m, and yes it rains there sometimes. The skiing is still fantastic.
Last edited by You need to Login to know who's really who. on Thu 15-12-11 20:54; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
|
Total length of pistes divided by 10.
|
|
|
|
|
You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
|
The altitude of Chamonix town is pretty irrelevant, isn't it? the fact that it's surrounded by very high mountains, and glaciers, does make a teeny bit of a difference.
Even in one country altitude is only part of the story. Other factors make a big difference. For example, the Beaufortain has higher snow levels at any given altitude than the Haute Tarentaise - almost invariably. The figures are on the Meteo France web site.
And of course latitude makes a huge difference, as do other aspects of geographical position - distances from oceans, ocean currents etc. It's as daft to get fixated on altitude as it is to get fixated on kms of piste.
Even late in the season, when you are more likely to find good conditions if you go to a higher altitude resort, in any one region, other factors come into play - Les Contamines, with some of its main skiing facing east, can have better conditions in late season than any of the Chamonix areas except the Grand Montets.
In cold periods, the last thing you want is to be at high altitude - no trees, higher winds, lower temperatures, etc etc. But it's pretty special to be skiing good snow at 2,800m in late spring, when the valleys are full of primroses and cows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: |
It's as daft to get fixated on altitude as it is to get fixated on kms of piste
|
Indeed it is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
sah wrote: |
Whitegold wrote: |
Cham is at 1035m.
Engelberg is at 1015m. |
Right, so the extra 35m makes a difference does it?
You're just wrong. Admit it. |
sah, you're new here right?
|
|
|
|
|
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
|
sah wrote: |
Whitegold wrote: |
Cham is at 1035m.
Engelberg is at 1015m. |
Right, so the extra 35m makes a difference does it?
You're just wrong. Admit it.
The altitude of where you sleep is not the important factor, it's where the lifts go and what the terrain is.
Whistler is at just over 600m, and yes it rains there sometimes. The skiing is still fantastic. |
I'll be at 1035m, spraying powda.
You'll be at 600m, getting rained on like a loser
|
|
|
|
|
|
cran wrote: |
It helps if it's higher at the top than at the bottom... |
That's Cervinia out then.
|
|
|
|
|
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
|
red 27 wrote: |
sah wrote: |
Whitegold wrote: |
Cham is at 1035m.
Engelberg is at 1015m. |
Right, so the extra 35m makes a difference does it?
You're just wrong. Admit it. |
sah, you're new here right? |
I can see why you'd think that...
|
|
|
|
|
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
|
Great thread
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: |
I have had both terrible snow conditions in La Plagne (1800m) and Pas De La Casa (2100m) and fantastic snow conditions in Kitzbühel (760m) all the same week in March.
|
That was some triple centre holiday!
|
|
|
|
|
You know it makes sense.
|
I for one found snow better in Austria possibly because there are relatively less skiers going there. The majority of icy runs, with a lot of traffic, I could remember were in France and Scotland.
|
|
|
|
|
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
|
I find that Altitude is only one of the factors to take into account. When booking a holiday I tend to use this simple formula to GUARANTEE that the resort I go to will be covered in snow:
(1 + x)n = 1 + (nx)/1! + (n(n - 1)x2)/2! + (n(n - 1)(n - 2)x3)/3! + ...
N =Village Altitude
If X <= 50 & assuming that p(x) = q(x)s(x) + r(x) you are guaranteed to have a good snow cover for your chosen dates.
|
|
|
|
|
Poster: A snowHead
|
Leeds_Skier, I concur.
|
|
|
|
|
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
|
1609m high.
So that you can join the mile high club at night!
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
|
I believe Niseko tops out around 1300. Who's gonna claim that's not high enough for good snow?
|
|
|
|
|
You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
|
Whitegold wrote: |
In the Western European Alps, the minimum village height is 1800m in Nov / May, 1500m in Dec / Mar / Apr, 800m in Jan / Feb.
|
I don't think village height is an accurate enough metric. Sölden, for example, is very snow-sure with a village height of 1377m, but peaks of over 3000m. You may need to finish the day with a gondola ride to the village, though.
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
|
Quote: |
I believe Niseko tops out around 1300. Who's gonna claim that's not high enough for good snow?
|
If non-Alpine resorts are included then we have to bring the latitude and how far from the coast line too. Wasn't impressed by Niseko snow myself when I hit it 2nd week in March and found only rock hard ice in the morning and slush in the afternoon. I think the resorts in the Alps are much more solidly based.
|
|
|
|
|
You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
|
Fort William 5 metres (Nevis lift base nearly 50metres)
|
|
|
|
|
|
saikee wrote: |
Quote: |
I believe Niseko tops out around 1300. Who's gonna claim that's not high enough for good snow?
|
If non-Alpine resorts are included then we have to bring the latitude and how far from the coast line too. Wasn't impressed by Niseko snow myself when I hit it 2nd week in March and found only rock hard ice in the morning and slush in the afternoon. I think the resorts in the Alps are much more solidly based. |
You have to take that into account within the Alpine countries too - which is my point exactly, more important factors than altitude (and Whitegold was the only one specifically talking about the Western Alps).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Many large ski areas will have different bits to stay in well over 500 M apart in altitude, unless you are obsessed with the quality of the snow on your homeward run the altitude of where you sleep is a pretty trivial part of planning a skiing holiday. At different times of the year the altitude and aspect of the bulk of the slopes may be an important consideration.
|
|
|
|
|
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
|
Whitegold wrote: |
You need atleast 200km of runs for a week's vacation. 100km for a weekend.
In the Western European Alps, the minimum village height is 1800m in Nov / May, 1500m in Dec / Mar / Apr, 800m in Jan / Feb.
|
Village height is almost irrelevant unless you are fixated on skiing back to the village at the end of the day.
What matters (in so far as height does matter) is the height of the lowest base station of the lifts you expect to ski down to regularly during the day.
But as others have said, there are other factors which really do outweigh sheer height in importance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizwald, How high do you want it Sir. Yes Sir we have one for sale at that hight.
|
|
|
|
|
|