Ski Club 2.0 Home
Snow Reports
FAQFAQ

Mail for help.Help!!

Log in to snowHeads to make it MUCH better! Registration's totally free, of course, and makes snowHeads easier to use and to understand, gives better searching, filtering etc. as well as access to 'members only' forums, discounts and deals that U don't even know exist as a 'guest' user. (btw. 50,000+ snowHeads already know all this, making snowHeads the biggest, most active community of snow-heads in the UK, so you'll be in good company)..... When you register, you get our free weekly(-ish) snow report by email. It's rather good and not made up by tourist offices (or people that love the tourist office and want to marry it either)... We don't share your email address with anyone and we never send out any of those cheesy 'message from our partners' emails either. Anyway, snowHeads really is MUCH better when you're logged in - not least because you get to post your own messages complaining about things that annoy you like perhaps this banner which, incidentally, disappears when you log in :-)
Username:-
 Password:
Remember me:
👁 durr, I forgot...
Or: Register
(to be a proper snow-head, all official-like!)

Anyone skied Dynastar 4x4 Powertrac Limited...what they like?

 Poster: A snowHead
Poster: A snowHead
This is an old ski, about the era of xscreams series. (about 2001 I think?)

Just want to use them as rock hoppers (which looking at conditions now i may need) so is it worth putting a pair of bindings on them, them seem rather stiff, stiffer than the x screams series as far as i remember (i had a pair of them in 179cm) and the dynastars are a sandwich construction

Could someone compare to a more modern ski, dimensions are 107 70 92

I am used to prophet 90's in 179 or watea 78's in 174, or Fischer RC4 race sc

I have a choice of 170cm or 178 in these dynastars.............

Thanks
ski holidays
 Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
anyone?
ski holidays



Terms and conditions  Privacy Policy