Poster: A snowHead
|
I'm sitting at work, in Cheltenham, looking at my shiny new Atomic SX:10's that are propped up next to my desk. It's 30 days, 14 hours, 51 minutes and 21 seconds before they'll get used. Great.
|
|
|
|
|
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
|
|
|
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
|
hyweljenkins, reading the title, I thought you were after some sort of glove
|
|
|
|
|
You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
|
I wandered around Cheltenam town centre with them - couldn't find any snow anywhere. Still, I work at the top of a five storey building, so I might give the stairs a try later.
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
|
whats supposed to be the difference then between the SX:10 and last seasons SX:9's??
|
|
|
|
|
You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
|
Dunno - colour, perhaps? My other skis are 12 year old Dynastar Radical Extreme, so these are somewhat different, even compared to what, I suppose, was a very early "carver".
I've got a review from last month's DMS&S magazine that I'll copy later if you're interested.
|
|
|
|
|
|
that would be good. I bought SX:9's last season and don't remember there being 10's then so I was imagining that the 10 is probably almost the same as last years 9!? I can't wait to get back out and give them a thrash, they're so much better than the silly salomon rubber bands I was on before!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
hyweljenkins, given the state of the snow at the moment, I would think that you would want 30 days before you had to use them!
|
|
|
|
|
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
|
Adam Holt, hyweljenkins, have a look here
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
|
|
|
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
|
Masque, you're right about the weight. Mine arrived separately. I picked the skis up with one arm, then went for the bindings. Bleedinell. Just walked from work t'car (about a mile) with then. Feel much fitter now. I'm just off to test them on the stairs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here you go (DMS&S January 2005)
Quote: |
Skiercross advanced (levels 5-
Overall likeability ***** (out of 5)
The lowdown:
Two years ago, Atomic took the then fledgling skiercross market sector by storm with the universally acclaimed SX:11. Last year a baby brother, the SX:9, was added. Our testers found it a bit software and easier to handle, and the curvier sidecut made it easier to turn at lower speeds. This year, Atomic has expanded its Supercross range (SX is the FIS abbreviation for "skiercross") yet further with the addition of the SX:10. The skis have the curvy shape of the SX9, combined with the high performance construction materials of the SX:11 (which we haven't tested yet this year). These include magnesium, which is one of Atomic's major innovations this season. In the SX:11, the magnesium is used in Power Channels, in the SX:10 in Power Rods. Both are tubes of metal running internally the length of the ski, one over each edge. But the Rods are thinner than the channels, allowing the skis to be more supple. Our testers loved the SX:10, and in terms of pure performance per pound it's certainly better value than the Atomic SX:B5 (see skiercross expert section). It won most of the on-piste criteria in our test, but was judged to be weaker in the power and bumps and slightly less amenable at lower speeds than the Volkl Supersport 5*.
Tester's Quotes
Pros
- Grip like limpets. Put them on edge and hang on for a thrilling ride
- Can be used by high- or low-end skiers
- Amazingly responsive and springs straight after each short turn
- Great entry-level race carver
Cons
- You have got to work them
Strengths
Long turns - 1st
Straight-line stability - 1st
High speed - 1st
Smoothness - 1st
Groomed piste - 1st
Short turns - joint 1st
Edge hold - 2nd
Liveliness/responsiveness - 2nd
All terrain/snow versatility - 2nd
Low speed - joint 2nd
Weaknesses
Powder/off-piste - 4th
Mogul performance - 4th
|
Considering that the Volkl SS5* is £170 more expensive, I think these are superb for the money. I don't want them to be great in moguls or powder just yet as I'm more interested in improving my skiing at the moment.
As for having to work them, well, I usually ski quite aggressively anyway and have plenty of strength in my legs to persuade them in to my way of thinking.
|
|
|
|
|
You know it makes sense.
|
hyweljenkins, that's pretty much why I chose them. The binding settings din chart was very interesting and goes a long way to explain the state of my achillies
|
|
|
|
|
|