Poster: A snowHead
|
Hi All,
I went to lockwoods as reccomended and came away with a pair of Xwave-10 boots.
I finally tested them at a dry slope for fit etc......
OUCH !
had to take them off after 10 minutes - major big aches on the outside edge of both feet, esp right foot - from the little toe down a couple of inches. now worried that they are the wrong boots for my feet ?
Also, i'm worried that they are too stiff ! I'm very much a struggling intermediate skier. and I had taken out the funny bolts that supposedly make them flex a bit more.
anyhow on the dry slope discoverd that I can't ski for toffee - nightmare ! couldn't get on and off the edged properly and couldn't get my for-aft ballance right - i was trying to get forward (bend ze knees) but was getting thrown back onto my tails.....
THEN I decided to try and speed up and carve.
cue comedy fall - lost hat and specs and had to get a fellow skier to find them for me !
sprained little finger - touch of whiplash as i nutted the slope- bruses to temple, arm back & nice graze on my temple too...
might go back thursday night for more damage.....
Anyone got any advice ? could the boots be too stiff (they say flex110 on them) ?
are my feet so wierd that i need a podietrist to tilt my foot beds or are my boots too narrow in the toe box ??? - i didn't have the clips over the foot tight.
cheers,
Gareth.
(grazed and confused)
I was told that i tend to stand on the outside of my feet 'normally' so this may explain the nasty ache ?
|
|
|
|
|
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
|
Do you have superfeet or custom footbeds in them?
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
|
|
|
You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
|
I had super feet orange in the boots.
no adjustment was made for the cuff alignment - anyone know of a self-test for checking if the cuff-'canting' is badly off ??
Dr eeyore, hello ! (do they sell the same boots to everyone ???) anyhow, what black magic did CEM do ? just fiddle with the canting bolt thingys ?
also Dr eeyore - do your custom footbeds tilt your feet at all ?
I'm not near lockwoods or bicester. so can't just pop-by too easily.
Gareth.
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
|
|
|
You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
|
fatgaz, CEM took the liners & footbeds out of the shell and had me stand barefoot in the shell, on the footbeds, and 'flex' my ankles. My 'right inside ankle bone' touched the inside of the boot. He muttered something along the lines of 'typical X-Wave problem', undid things, muttered a bit more and gave me back a pair of boots that fit nicely.
|
|
|
|
|
|
fatgaz, 5mm allen key on the outside(lateral) cant rivet, turn through 180° and your set. Salomon X-Wave had the coller mountings set at 4°, twice as much as needed for the average Joe. We spent years widening boots in this problem area often without sucsess, then Salomon let it slip.
|
|
|
|
|
|
roga wrote: |
fatgaz
however painful they may be when skiing on dry here the boots will be far worse in cold temperatures when the plastic is hard and even more unforgiving
|
this is the other possible issue I might have... are the boots too stiff for my ability ? the flex in these X-waves does seem to partly come from the (spaceframe ?) cutouts that cause the shell to flex as much if not more than movement of the ankle pivot point. Also it seems to me that when i try to flex the boots i seem to be squashing the tongue quite a lot rather than the whole boot flexing - it leaves a bit of a gap at the back of my calf (my calves are not very big). i think the boots are the right size at least - they are quite snug.
I was having a hard time getting on and off my edges 'though - maybe if my boots are not 'flat' when i think they should be then I'll tend to catch edges more ?
on a plus point, my little finger is much less blue that it was on saturday !
cheers for the comments roga.
Gareth.
Last edited by After all it is free on Tue 11-12-07 14:23; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
|
SMALLZOOKEEPER wrote: |
fatgaz, 5mm allen key on the outside(lateral) cant rivet, turn through 180° and your set. Salomon X-Wave had the coller mountings set at 4°, twice as much as needed for the average Joe. We spent years widening boots in this problem area often without sucsess, then Salomon let it slip. |
Hi SZK, so you think that out-of-the-box, the boots are set up for someone who is bandy-legged ? ie they are angled outwards ?
As far as i can remember, the canting bolts on both sides of the boot are set the same.
SO, if I understand you correctly, the outside bolt is turned to push upwards so that the shell is angled inwards more ?
Gareth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
fatgaz, Just do it. The little arrow on the rivet should face down, with the gap above. If it doesn't work, get them stretched.
|
|
|
|
|
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
|
fatgaz wrote: |
this is the other possible issue I might have... are the boots too stiff for my ability ? the flex in these X-waves does seem to partly come from the (spaceframe ?) cutouts that cause the shell to flex as much if not more than movement of the ankle pivot point. Also it seems to me that when i try to flex the boots i seem to be squashing the tongue quite a lot rather than the whole boot flexing - it leaves a bit of a gap at the back of my calf (my calves are not very big). i think the boots are the right size at least - they are quite snug. |
Well I don't know much about these boots to be honest and there are far better qualified people on here to comment (one has just posted above ). However looking on the net for information a couple of things strike me:
Firstly the X Wave 10 is apparently a boot from last season - nothing wrong with that especially if you got them at a discount but I hope they made this clear to you.
Secondly it appears to be a boot for aggressive advanced and expert skiers which doesn't seem to fit what you described as your ability above, from the Al's Ski Barn website:
Quote: |
The Salomon X Wave 10 is for advanced to expert skiers with a strong and aggressive style. This is the ultimate powder weapon. Unibody Construction, Double Canting Adjustment, and My Customfit Pro Liner put the Salomon X Wave 10 above the rest in this price category. With an all-new design for 2006, the Salomon X Wave 10.0 Free is now sporting a Spaceframe construction allowing the X Wave series top continue to be the do-anything boot for almost any advanced to expert skiers. |
Again I hope they made this clear?
fatgaz wrote: |
I was having a hard time getting on and off my edges 'though - maybe if my boots are not 'flat' when i think they should be then I'll tend to catch edges more ? |
Perhaps it could be that yes, off the top of my head I'd guess that could be caused by footbeds that aren't supporting your foot properly (although it might not be such a critical issue at your level) or, as mentioned above, the cuff and probably a number of other factors the experts could mention - it's really a matter of playing around with them and seeing what helps but I'd suggest the bottom line may be to question whether the boots are suitable in the first place. Sorry to say that but I've been there and done it with boots that, at the time, were far too stiff for me and it held me back considerably.
Quote: |
on a plus point, my little finger is much less blue that it was on saturday ! |
Good, sounds like a nasty one!
You may find next time you try plastic you'll be over cautious and that'll cause you problems, something I found after injuring myself a while back - it took me a few weeks to get fully into it again after I'd healed but just run with it and try not to get too frustrated and you'll get there eventually
Quote: |
cheers for the comments roga. |
No problem and bear in mind I'm no expert with boots so take what I say with a pinch of salt but I have had my fair share of boot hassles in the past so I know what you're going through
|
|
|
|
|
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
|
SMALLZOOKEEPER wrote: |
fatgaz, Just do it. |
you're starting to sound just like my mam !
OK : 180 deg to give me 'arrow down, gap up' and on the outside of the boots only.
Will probably give them another go this thursday eve. - and see what new injuries I can pick-up !
Gareth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
roga wrote: |
Firstly the X Wave 10 is apparently a boot from last season - nothing wrong with that especially if you got them at a discount but I hope they made this clear to you.
Secondly it appears to be a boot for aggressive advanced and expert skiers which doesn't seem to fit what you described as your ability above |
Apparently, I can soften the boots a bit by removing bolts in the shell - how much is changes is not very clear, maybe 10% - i have been told that they end up closer to the flex of the x-wave 8 model ?
Gareth.
|
|
|
|
|
You know it makes sense.
|
I wouldn't blame it all on the boots, have you ever been to a dryslope before? I think they show up ALL your flaws, I went once after feeling I was coming along nicely on snow and have never been back, couldn't turn at all on the steeper bits, just kept falling and I ended up just snowplowing lost as that was the only way I felt in control
|
|
|
|
|
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
|
^^ From info on the net the flex index on the 10 seems to be 110 and the 8 around 75/80 so you'll need more than a 10% reduction to get it down to the same flex as the 8.
Again there will be experts around here who'll be able to advise you and depending on your weight, height and ability will be able to tell you what sort of flex you should be looking for and whether the 10 can be detuned to that level.
From my inexpert POV the 10s don't appear to be the best solution but I might be completely wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
Poster: A snowHead
|
|
|
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
|
Mosha Marc, So true. A Booster is the only solution after.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
|
|
|
You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
|
SMALLZOOKEEPER wrote: |
fatgaz, 5mm allen key on the outside(lateral) cant rivet, turn through 180° and your set. Salomon X-Wave had the coller mountings set at 4°, twice as much as needed for the average Joe. We spent years widening boots in this problem area often without sucsess, then Salomon let it slip. |
Would that, since you mention it, also apply to the (undeniably tasteful) translucent green Salomon Teneighty from a few years back? Shells are basically a softer, uglier X-wave, I think. Could explain why I've never been able to get a wholly satisfactory feel from aftermarket footbeds.
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
|
Cunners, that would be right
|
|
|
|
|
You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
|
Then I shall equip myself with my superfeet & custom moulded numbers and venture forth. I shall also bung 50p or so in the snowheads meter, by way of thanks for that very useful bit of info. Ta
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm very interested in this I got boots from profeet two weeks ago, custom liners + footbeds I went to Hemel Sunday (as I do every Sunday) I could do two runs and that's it before i was scrabbling to get the boots off..in agony. They were set on the first (loosest) buckle setting..There is no way I would be able to get the top buckle on the second buckle setting - you'd need Arnies muscles for that and my foot would fall off.
I'm going to wear them at home tonight and tomorrow to see how I cope other wise they are going back. I'm hoping thay take a bit of time to bed in..felt fine in the shop!
|
|
|
|
|
|
cfc5mu0, foam liners....did you wear them for an hour or so the evening that you had them fitted, this is somthing i always recomend with foam liners, it just helps the foam settle back and takes some of the issues away from break in, get them on as much as you can between now and when you ski
|
|
|
|
|
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
|
Had a similar problem myself after buying new boots. Agony after a couple of hours and the feeling that the toe box wasnt big enough becuase my toes were being crushed. Went back to Lockwoods, they did another shell check. There was enough room in the boot and after looking at my feet the chap referred me to a podiatrist with the view that I had a forefoot varus. After xrays and a biomechanical study it turns out that as well as the forefoot varus I have an old fracture injury in my left foot that I didnt know about. I have an equinus deformity with the smallest ankle joint motion that the guy had ever seen in 27years of practise!
Ive ended up with stretching exercises for my calf muscles and some orthotics on order which I get fitted on Friday. Hope it works, will let you know after a session at the Snowdome on Sat. The message in this ramble is that the boots may be ok. It may well be your feet that are the problem (I note you mentioned that you walk on the outside edge of your feet. Take a look at your shoes and see where the wear is). A good bootfitter will be able to recognise this and refer you to the right people for help.
|
|
|
|
|
|
cfc5mu0, I'd second the wearing them on the evening of the day you had them fitted. CEM & LARGEZOOKEEPER did mine in Tignes in October. I felt like a numbty wearing them in the bar that night, but they've been perfect ever since.
|
|
|
|
|
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
|
Well chaps I have them on now sitting at my computer...15 mins and counting..Ouch..
I'll be back with a report..
|
|
|
|
|
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
|
cfc5mu0, the reason for doing it on the day is that the foam is still expan ding a little ...putting them on helps to push it back and reduces the expansion to any more thsn it should be.....sounds like they will be fine, just take a little longer to break in than they could have done
|
|
|
|
|
|
ho hum......
Well, I'm properly confused now. it may well be that my boots (X wave 10) are too stiff for me ?
apparently the 10's can have the flex reduced to the 9's level '110' to '100', where as the x-wave 8's are a '90' flex rating. also read something that said you don't need stiff boots these days with modern piste skis ?
so still worried i have the wrong boots and it will have been a very expensive mistake !
ALSO, regarding the canting bolts to adjust the cuff alignment, both bolts are set the same on each side,
so the wide part of the washer is at the bottom on both sides. this is apparently the neutral set-up in the little user guide that came with the boots. should i really be fiddling with these ?
I had a quick word with the nice chap who sold me the boots in lockwoods and he said i might be having hassles due to a forefoot varus tilt. I do stand normally with my feet at a 10 to 2 angle; my right foot at a larger angle than my left. will i need to throw even more cash at this problem ? it seems that orthotics to accommodate this might have a tilt/ramp to raise the big toe up a bit and/or a heel raise might help in spreading my weight over more of my forefoot ?
if CEM or a zookeeper have any comments ?
thanks all,
Gareth.
oh I'm not that fat - just a skinny unfit chap wrapped in a flabby 30-something body. 83-ish kilos at the moment. would like to be 73-ish kilos !
|
|
|
|
|
You know it makes sense.
|
fatgaz, at 83 kilos, you may need a name change, compared to some of us around here. Suggest mediumsizegaz instead...
|
|
|
|
|
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
|
fatgaz wrote: |
I was told that i tend to stand on the outside of my feet 'normally' so this may explain the nasty ache ? |
A suggestion.
When you had your boots fitted I'll bet you were standing in your normal spazzy* outside-of-the-foot position. I'll also bet you can't get your feet flat in your boots and the outsides of your feet are taking the pressure when you ski. If so, you should get them re-fitted but when you are standing there with your trousers all rolled up, make you can flatten your feet.
When you lift something very heavy, the feet will work best when you take the pressure on the first metatarsal (big toe side). You need to do this when skiing but your boots won't let you. Hence the ouch.
Good luck.
* just like me
|
|
|
|
|
Poster: A snowHead
|
<DIY>
OK, currently sat with tweaked boots on
(1) altered flex by removing bolts; they're are noticeably less stiff, but not by a huge amount....
(2) I have canted the boot uppers inwards - tricky to tell the difference, but it may be better, I can feel both sides of my ankles more evenly ? doesn't feel like there is a major misalignment - but I guess that I need to try skiing to find out ? it might be my imagination, but i think i'm more centred with the boots flat on the floor.
(3) I have also made some shims that i've put between the inner and the boot shell. made from 4mm hardboard, a weetabix packet, doubles sided tape and a rotary sander. i have a ~5 deg tilt under the bigtoe to the middle toe area going back to the arch and I have put a 4mm heel lift in.
Result ? well as expected, the boots are snugger, i can still wiggle my toes, but not as much as i used to. I will leave the boots on for 15 mins to see if i get any pins-needles that might indicate I've runout of volume.
if this seems to sort things then I probably do need to visit a podiatrist.....
</DIY>
Planning to go to the slope again tomorrow for a test. will report back with my injuries.....
Gareth
(well, I feel fat so i'll stay fatgaz until i loose the extra flab.... my belly is definitely in the way sometimes, especially doing yoga or when in the drops of my road bike)
|
|
|
|
|
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
|
You're doing too much at once so it will be hard to determine which solution solves which problem. Just change the canting and go from there, trust me, we've sold a couple of X-Waves over the years.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
|
Another idea that might be worth taking into consideration is the "styloid process". This is an area behind your fifth toe (on the metatarsal) it's a bony lumpy bit which is more extreme with some people than others - Attached to this bony protrusion is a tendon that links up to a muscle - very painful/achy when pressured. This is obviously is exacerbated by boot pressure (especially people with wide feet).
Normal solution here is
Provide more room for the styloid process – reducing the pressure
If you google (images) - 'styloid process foot' you'll see some x-rays of the area I am talking about - if it is the same it might be worth pursueing.
|
|
|
|
|
You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
|
I've taken the heel lift out, left the forefoot wedges in. feels like there is a bit less room in my right boot, probably my bigger foot. i think my right foot might have a worse 'forefoot vagus' too - but I ain't no medic....
G.
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
|
I'd never heard of 'forefoot varus tilt' - so I googled it. (Google being the indispensable tool for a jobbing GP)
http://www.drpribut.com/sports/spgait.html
Hmm. It seems it's a misnomer. Varus (and the opposite, valgus) refer to angulation away/to the midline (eg genu valgus = knock knees; the lower leg is angulated away from the midline / genu varum = bow legged; the lower leg is angulated towards the midline). What that site would suggest is that it's a supination (inversion) of the forefoot with respect to the hindfoot.
And to my semi-educated mind, it would be the sort of problem a foot bed ought to sort.
|
|
|
|
|
You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
|
firstly apologies for the techy post
doctor_eeyore, a true forefoot varus is vary rare, forefoot valgus is much more common, but often forefoot varus is wrongly diagnosed due to the examination technique [depending on where the examiner has been trained, west coast USA very little forefoot varus, east coast USA loads of forefoot varus, i can only guess that this is down to the preferences in examination technique between professors teaching biomechanics, the UK is a real mix probably do the the same reasons ]
a footbed will support the foot but if the varus is severe then it is probably not strong enough to do the job [this is when a corrective orthotic is required] if the foot is heavily pronated, often times the foot will sit in an abducted position [abduction being one of the three key components of pronation the others being eversion & dorsiflexion....supination being a combination of inversion, adduction & plantar flexion] when the foot is rotated to a parallel stance as in skiing there can be a muscular imablance which can cause an aquired forefoot varus [often times being refered to as forefoot supinatus] if the forefoot varus is flexible then it may be compensated for by the mid tarsal joint in these cases often the secret is to balance enough support to allow the foot to sit in the compensated position, if the varus is rigid then the footbed/orthotic has to fill the gaps [bring the ground up to the foot] to allow pressure to be evenly distributed over the whole of the foot
the correct footbed, stretching of calf muscles and possibly a small heel lift to reduces pronatory forces can all help. an off the peg footbed will not support any forefoot differencial from flat as they must cater for all
as you can see it is a a mine field and this is just the basics of the position
|
|
|
|
|
|
CEM wrote: |
firstly apologies for the techy post |
and so early in the morning! Not to be outdone a slightly pedantic response!
Quote: |
doctor_eeyore, a true forefoot varus is vary rare, forefoot valgus is much more common, but often forefoot varus is wrongly diagnosed due to the examination technique [depending on where the examiner has been trained, west coast USA very little forefoot varus, east coast USA loads of forefoot varus, i can only guess that this is down to the preferences in examination technique between professors teaching biomechanics, the UK is a real mix probably do the the same reasons ] |
With such interobserver error it would strike me that the examination is not a good one. Imagine if your glasses prescription varied according to where your optician was trained!
Quote: |
a footbed will support the foot ...snip... aquired forefoot varus [often times being refered to as forefoot supinatus] |
I think this is a better term. I'll have to find a model foot, but I still (at the moment) hold that this deformity is one of rotation rather than angulation, even if the net effect is an apparent angulation at certain positions of the ankle. (In a similar fashion, you can generate an appearance similar to genu valgus (knock knees) by flexing the knee joint and internally rotating the hip - the lower leg is angled away from the midline, (as in g. valgus) but there is no deformity of the knee joint.
Quote: |
as you can see it is a a mine field and this is just the basics of the position |
All interesting stuff; and now I learn that FF varus is congenital (torsion of the neck of the talus = rotation!) and FF supinatus is acquired.
I just think the names given to the problem don't accurately reflect the anatomy. To avoid this, I propose a change of name to Colin's Syndome (congenital or acquired) (or perhaps Eeyore's Hoof if you're modest)
I'll stop hijacking the thread now!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
|
|
|
|
fatgaz wrote: |
(a dejected and defeated) Gareth.
PS, i noticed this morning that I stand with my left foot at about a 15-20deg angle out, but with my right foot at about 30-40ish angle out. Maybe I need to give skiing up and take up snowboarding* as the binding are set more to these sort of angles.....
* luke, that way the dark side lies. |
Most people stand with their feet splayed to a greater or lesser degree- it has some correlation with race, and is generally a function of the hip rather than the foot. I stand with both feet at about 40° (dodgy ankles again).
The problem is of diagnosis on the net - it's an even less exact science than diagnosis in person, and can lead to confusion and people hijacking your thread In other words, stop worrying and trying to self-diagnose & go to see someone. I only know Lockwoods & CEM so I'm not in a position to recommend anyone else, sorry.
Good luck!
|
|
|
|
|
|