Poster: A snowHead
|
They're at it again - big fight!.
and unsurprisingly starring the gold-fish one ( who else?) and the subject being heli-skiing, old bun-fights concerning the club.,etc....
makes one lose the desire to live
Last edited by Poster: A snowHead on Thu 20-04-06 19:43; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
|
Thanks for the breathless report, hibernia.
Is this a membership drive, or a suicide note?
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
|
ooh I must go!
I'll creep in unoticed again!
Last edited by Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see? on Thu 20-04-06 19:47; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
|
hibernia, go o, let us have your logon details so we can have a shuftie. Promise not to say anything that may get you in trouble
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
|
I really must join . . .
|
|
|
|
|
You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
|
Rather there than here
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frosty the Snowman, I thought you were off to get your nuts shelled ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
If anyone wishes to cut 'n paste the thread over here I've no objection. The other copyright holders can state their own preferences.
The future of heli-skiing is, actually, a relevant environmental issue for us all.
|
|
|
|
|
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
|
|
|
|
|
|
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
|
The Abominable snowHead wrote: |
If anyone wishes to cut 'n paste the thread over here I've no objection. The other copyright holders can state their own preferences.
The future of heli-skiing is, actually, a relevant environmental issue for us all. |
That was the title of the thread, but it changed to other things that lead to the slanging match.
|
|
|
|
|
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
|
the main protagonists are the goldfish one and Tim Brown ( + others )
winner will be announced later.
|
|
|
|
|
|
hibernia, out of mild curiosity, are they actually debating the issue, or has the argument moved on to some other non-related matter that happens here?
|
|
|
|
|
You know it makes sense.
|
I think its safe to say that David Goldsmith is not The Abominable Tim Brown
|
|
|
|
|
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
|
Masque, please do join!
|
|
|
|
|
Poster: A snowHead
|
Ray Zorro, no refeence to snowheads, but wait, it does concern a thread that did appear on snowheads about six or so months ago ( ? )concerning a snowhead called snowball on this section ( SCGB ) of the site. So the original issue, that has now developed into a slanging match, apologies requested, etc...., appears to have been a Snowheads posting.
|
|
|
|
|
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
|
I remember snowball was upset about that thread. Storm in a teacup.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
|
hibernia, that's not what the apologies are being requested over.
|
|
|
|
|
You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
|
Masque wrote: |
Frosty the Snowman, I thought you were off to get your nuts shelled ? |
I'm going to the eosb,not bloody Iraq.
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
|
Its well worth watching, and its keeping Mr Goldsmith fully occupied which leaves us in peace for a while. He launched 6 or 7 threads in about 10 days and then waited for people to bite which they did in a manner that must have made his day. Mr Goldsmith has taken a few hits below the waterline especially his habit of refusing to answer awkward questions.
|
|
|
|
|
You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
|
riverman, makes one pine for the good old days of T&C here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tim Brown, Well I certainly can't hide behind a mask if I do
|
|
|
|
|
|
Masque, I don't think anyone would object to your turning up at the Ski Club Ball, Royal Lancaster Hotel, in a mask.
'Black tie' is obligatory. Dress suggestions:
|
|
|
|
|
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
|
Masque, agreed, but that's the best thing about the scgb forum, no silly names and no multiple personalities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tim Brown, agreed
|
|
|
|
|
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
|
I'd agree with that too. The problem is that our Club's forum is almost devoid of fresh threads and new blood, and we're a 30,000-member body.
So it's a bit of a moot point.
|
|
|
|
|
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
|
Quote: |
Ski Club Ball, Royal Lancaster Hotel
|
Wherabouts in Lancaster is this place?
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Lancaster, overlooking Hyde Park
|
|
|
|
|
You know it makes sense.
|
Tim Brown wrote: |
Masque, agreed, but that's the best thing about the scgb forum, no silly names and no multiple personalities. |
Are you taking the pi$$ ?
|
|
|
|
|
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
|
The Abominable snowHead,
I thought one of your main concerns was that the SCGB was not attracting a big enough percentage of the skier/snowboarder population of the UK ?
You keep asking questions about added value from their website, magazine, reps and the number of new skiers signed up by the reps. I think you also keep tabs on figures from yesteryear which you produce to make comparisons.
The helisking/trains to resort questions are probably about as popular with many as electric cars would be with Jeremy Clarkson.
Taking the green issues to the logical conclusion would probably mean asking people not to go abroad on holiday like other pressure groups.
|
|
|
|
|
Poster: A snowHead
|
The Abominable snowHead wrote: |
South Lancaster, overlooking Hyde Park |
I thought South Lancaster overlooked Garstang
|
|
|
|
|
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
|
|
|
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
|
Latchigo wrote: |
The Abominable snowHead ... Taking the green issues to the logical conclusion would probably mean asking people not to go abroad on holiday like other pressure groups. |
Yes, it sounds like complete and utter madness doesn't it?
Don't know if you've been up to the glaciers in summer recently, but the latest ideas are firing snowguns at them and covering them with protective plastic sheets.
Tough choices lie ahead.
|
|
|
|
|
You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
|
|
|
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
|
|
|
You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
|
richjp, careful, you might upset DG's followers!
|
|
|
|
|
|
richjp
I take it the "crap" you so charmingly refer to does not include the factual data which has been sourced from the Club's annual reports. This included:
---------------------------------
NEW MEMBER RECRUITMENT
1992-3: 989 new members recruited by reps, in 33 resorts.
2004-5: 699 new members recruited by reps, in 44 resorts.
COST OF REPPING SERVICE
2004-5: £184,857 ('Skiing Operations' expenditure).
1992-3: £71,637.
NUMBER OF SKIERS SKIING WITH REPS
1992-3: "approx 7000" people (across 33 resorts)
2004-5: 5528 people (across 44 resorts)
---------------------------------
Instead of publishing gratuitous insults to a fellow member of your Club on a public forum, how about presenting a positive friendly image?
We're one big happy family, at the end of the day ... aren't we?
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Goldsmith wrote: |
We're one big happy family, at the end of the day ... aren't we? |
er... seemingly not.
|
|
|
|
|
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
|
DavidS, in real life, SCGB members skiing on the slopes do seem to be a happy bunch. The SCGB section of the club forum has been acrimonious. By bringing those squabbles to snowheads DG has been bringing the club into disrepute, IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Abominable snowHead wrote: |
|
Why don't you stick with one user name? I thought the David Goldsmith version had gone off in a huff?
|
|
|
|
|
|