Ski Club 2.0 Home
Snow Reports
FAQFAQ

Mail for help.Help!!

Log in to snowHeads to make it MUCH better! Registration's totally free, of course, and makes snowHeads easier to use and to understand, gives better searching, filtering etc. as well as access to 'members only' forums, discounts and deals that U don't even know exist as a 'guest' user. (btw. 50,000+ snowHeads already know all this, making snowHeads the biggest, most active community of snow-heads in the UK, so you'll be in good company)..... When you register, you get our free weekly(-ish) snow report by email. It's rather good and not made up by tourist offices (or people that love the tourist office and want to marry it either)... We don't share your email address with anyone and we never send out any of those cheesy 'message from our partners' emails either. Anyway, snowHeads really is MUCH better when you're logged in - not least because you get to post your own messages complaining about things that annoy you like perhaps this banner which, incidentally, disappears when you log in :-)
Username:-
 Password:
Remember me:
👁 durr, I forgot...
Or: Register
(to be a proper snow-head, all official-like!)

Val d'Isère as a beginner?

 Poster: A snowHead
Poster: A snowHead
Dr John wrote:
CathS wrote:

Courchevel 1650 would be a much better place to take a beginner than Val d'Isere.


Apart from the fact that 1650 is an artificial construct and pretty much dead after 8pm, while ValD is an actual living town with a life and soul to match. There is more to a first ski holiday than green runs.


I had a great couple of holidays at 1650 staying in a large and very sociable chalet with excellent food and a fun group of people.
ski holidays
 Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
@Dr John, your point about Courchevel 1650 being an artificial construct and dead after 8pm I’d agree with.
Val D’Isere does have a proper living town, even if it’s dominated by more accommodation built specifically for letting out during the winter season.

My point would be that, if you ski for 1 or 2 weeks per year, the mountains and quality of skiing far outweighs town ambience as a factor of importance.

There are far better towns and cities with nightlife to enjoy in the U.K. than either of those ski resorts. I can get that, say, 50 weeks a year.
snow conditions
 Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
CathS wrote:
Dr John wrote:
CathS wrote:

Courchevel 1650 would be a much better place to take a beginner than Val d'Isere.


Apart from the fact that 1650 is an artificial construct and pretty much dead after 8pm, while ValD is an actual living town with a life and soul to match. There is more to a first ski holiday than green runs.


I had a great couple of holidays at 1650 staying in a large and very sociable chalet with excellent food and a fun group of people.


Tenuous at best - the quality of skiing for a week should always outweigh the fact as to whether there are a few residents - Courch is just a better ski area for their needs.
VdI is no doubt magical for intermediates and above
snow report



Terms and conditions  Privacy Policy