 Poster: A snowHead
|
|
|
|
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
|
Would I be right in suggesting that with many of these stations lift systems owned by the Marie ,the abolishment of Tax D habitation has accelerated the situation now that the paymasters are central government ?
Without having quite a tot al understanding the tax situation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
|
|
French ski industry is in freefall.
|
|
|
|
|
|
You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
|
| davidof wrote: |
| stevew wrote: |
The developers of the apartments must be pretty p***ed |
they must be livid, can't imagine what those places are worth now |
They must be stupid. This place was already in agony when I cycled over that hill some 20 years ago. Too little, too low. Not enough cash flow to do the necessary. Building poses an enormous fire risk now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
|
|
@Tristero, 1400 meters on a NE facing bowl, if that was too low 20 years ago you can forget about skiing in France in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
|
| davidof wrote: |
| @Tristero, 1400 meters on a NE facing bowl, if that was too low 20 years ago you can forget about skiing in France in the future. |
Been in Grenoble winters 03/04 and half of 02/03. There has been snow at that altitude. I remember some fantastic/crazy ski touring up Charmant Som around christmas '03. But there have always been rain spells below 2000m from time to time. And that's it's major fault: It's not too low at the bottom, but much too low at the top. As a consequence they never managed to put enough money aside to afford good snowmaking and at least two fast chairs (one from the bottom up to the Crête and another one to the top of Le Pérollier). So it's been always a gamble and very few people would ever consider going there for their holidays. On top of that, views may be nice but the skiing itself is quite limited for better skiers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
La Chapelle-d'Abondance - slopes 1,000m to 1,700m, with just a tiny handful of lifts and pistes. Unviable in an expensive age I suppose.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's been a problem for some time, we took a trip to Morgins (small swiss resort just across the border from Chatel) 20 years ago and it was struggling even then (altitude 1300m and temps too high).
|
|
|
|
|
|
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
|
| Snow&skifan wrote: |
| La Chapelle-d'Abondance - slopes 1,000m to 1,700m, with just a tiny handful of lifts and pistes. Unviable in an expensive age I suppose. |
Issue with La Chapelle is it’s only 5 kms from Châtel and is overlooked. There are two sectors which are not connected to each other on either side of the valley . The sector connected to PDS is away from village and on sunny side of valley, lacking adequate modern snow making, and travels through Switzerland, via aging lifts that are difficult to upgrade due to CH regulations. They have invested in developing cross country skiing in the very cold shaded valley floor. The village is a great base and local commerce seems to do well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
