Poster: A snowHead
|
maggi, it's also how some people try to ski powder.
|
|
|
|
|
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
|
easiski, Sounds so easy .... will just have to keep trying it will come one day
maggi, Don't know how long that fear really lasts ... instructors soon demonstrate how difficult it is to fall 'forwards' ... so I can't even use that one anymore ..
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
|
maggi, sometimes it might be but not always, there's a whole host of reasons for a bad stance, a good instructor howver will be able to ascertain what's wrong and put it right, a bad instructor of course will do nothing
|
|
|
|
|
You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
|
D G Orf, the funny thing is, I had been skiing maybe 15 weeks in Europe and North America before anyone even mentioned stance to me.
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
|
Wear The Fox Hat, not having seen you ski I don't know how good or bad your stance was
|
|
|
|
|
You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
|
Wear The Fox Hat, Ski teaching, like everything else in life is never static. Stance was less important with straight skis as we all pretty much stood on our heels and pushed the skis around anyway. Only the very best skiers in the world were really able to "carve" on those skis. Look at old films of heros like Stenmark - it's quite shocking!
However, as we're learning more about sport science, physiology and biomechanics, and with equipment now being designed to work WITH the human body, we're changing emphases all the time. With carvers, we're using the ski to work for us, so standing on the right part of our foot to allow this to happen has become much more important.
Basic stance problems now affect us in ways that it never used to, we've begun to realise it, and we've begun to address it.
Maggi, Leaning back can be caused by fear, but this fear can be overcome by technique. Once you stand correctly and in balance on your skis you feel so safe that you never look back. Having said that, any change in the way you ski must be practised on easy slopes until comfortable and then on a gentle progression of steeper slopes. If you learn something on a green, you can't immediately tranfer it to a black.
|
|
|
|
|
|
D G Orf wrote: |
Wear The Fox Hat, not having seen you ski I don't know how good or bad your stance was |
Just a few minor adjustments -
1. cuff cant - now they are both lined up with my legs centrally in them.
2. flex - angle grinder taken to the front of my cuffs to allow me to flex further forward
3. 1.5mm heel lifts to get the angle right when I'm on my Tyrollia bindings. This does mean I am further forward when on my Rossi bindings, which are on my Pistols. This, in turn, has had the knock-on effect of making my Pistols easier to get into a carve on piste.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leaning back... ? I generally think if my shins are complaining that is ok. Bend zee knees, flex the angles, drop the hips, should all be getting the skier into the right position but if they can't recognise the right position it may not help much. I actually think it is easier to 'cheat' on carvers as the skis are turning machines by comparison, hence no poles for lots of people. On old 2m planks you had to work the ski. And of course, they were pretty crap by today's standards. I would hate to be on them now but it would be interesting to see how I now skied on them. I would probably bin them after 1 run..!!! Although I maintain great memories of the old Superforce 3s as it started me on the road to what I do know...!!
And race stiff boots are no joy for everyday skiing so forget about them unless you race...!!
They will harm your stance as much as anything else IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
|
JT, Dropping the hips is out nowadays! Hips over centre/ball of foot - stand on your BALLS!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
easiski,
Yes, I just included them as sayings of the day, and as for the other, I can just hear you screaming that all over the mountain...!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
|
Quote: |
Isn't leaning back caused by fear of the steep (to a beginner) slope?
|
I'm not convinced that it is, or at least not totally. The simple fact is that if you walk down a slope, you have to "lean back" or you would fall flat on your face. As a beginning skier, your brain / nervous system has not had sufficient experience to convince it that "leaning back" is not necessary when going down a slope with long planks stuck on your feet; indeed, not only unnecessary but counter-productive. As the newly learned motor skills start to become "second nature", the unconsciously perceived need to "lean back" tends to disappear.
Now who wants to talk about why beginners hold their arms the way they do?
|
|
|
|
|
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
|
[quote="easiskiHaving said that, any change in the way you ski must be practised on easy slopes until comfortable and then on a gentle progression of steeper slopes. If you learn something on a green, you can't immediately tranfer it to a black.[/quote]
I know what you mean. My stance seems to vary from ok to totally crap with no inbetween. I just wish that I could sense it when I sit on my heels hehehe
|
|
|
|
|
|
Easiski said <Telling people to lean forward, without explaining HOW to lean forward is not remotely helpful. The ususal result is shoulders forward and down and bottom back and down - worst thing possible. You need to keep your hips forward and stand up as D G Orf, says, but flex the ankle. >
That's my problem. So what you are basically saying is lead with our genitals? hehehe
|
|
|
|
|
You know it makes sense.
|
|
|
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
|
Wear The Fox Hat wrote: |
easiski.... It's like people who always buy the same brand of car, or always order the same wine, or same meal at restaurants.
That's not the kind of person I am. Yes, I have food and wine that I like, but I also enjoy trying new and different things. I guess some just stick to Chicken Maryland and Chateau Neuf du Pape. |
Know what you mean, but supply me with enough 1990 Romanée Conti La Tâche to last a lifetime, and I'll happily drink nothing else. I'll even give up water!
|
|
|
|
|
Poster: A snowHead
|
|
|
brian
brian
Guest
|
Wear The Fox Hat wrote: |
They are happy to be where they are, believing they are great skiers, and would feel insulted if someone suggested they take a lesson to improve - this occurs in people who have learned on straight skis, and now own more shaped ones, but still ski with their boots locked together and skidding most turns. It's not a case that they are skiing badly, but they could ski so much better, if only their ego would let them. |
I loosely fit that description but it's not ego, it's lack of time as much as anything. It's easy for you with your multi-week skiing winters to devote lots of time to technique. With a couple of young kids, for the last few seasons I've been scraping the odd day at home and some short trips abroad. I get on the hill just bursting to get out there skiing. I know my technique's a bit rough but I'm having too much fun and there's always a wee procrastinating thought there, "I'll get this sorted next trip".
Anyway this winter, with hopefully a few more days on snow, I am resolved to get my 80s throwback technique up to date
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
|
|
|
You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
|
Scarpa wrote: |
So what you are basically saying is lead with our genitals? hehehe |
One of the favourite mantras of my first proper instructor (idiosyncratic old school), when initiating turns, was "Point your willee down ze 'eeel. Laydees....make somesing up!"
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
|
|
|
You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
|
easiski, In the true spirit of the intermediate plateau, do you not think there is a natural level for each person where the pace of progress slows, maybe a sort of naturally enforced consolidation period, before they can once again improve significantly?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arno, I don't think there is an absolute limit, but eventually you get to a point where the marginal improvement per hour spent becomes very small. One point of the thread was that I wanted to make sure that my opinion was not unique - that people using the IP as an excuse for not getting better, while claiming that they wanted to improve - was bogus. So your statement is absolutely correct.
slikedges, I would guess there's a lumpy learning curve, I'm now looking for my next "breakthrough" moment to get over my current flat spot.
easiski, I still agree with your opinion. I'm just pleased that I can be quite firm in my responses when someone tries to use "it" as an excuse for not getting better, not taking lessons, etc.
I don't agree that only the best skiers in the world (BSITW) could carve on skinny skis though. I humbly submit that I carved some really sweet non-skidding arcs out of my 7Ss in 1989...and I'm certainly not one of the BSITW, etc. Admittedly a bit more control input was required...
brian, I see your point, but wonder whether just one little hours instruction might not reap terrific rewards. I know some teachers will do an hours private lesson from 0800hrs which might not get in the way of anything else (except the alpine hangover)??
Wear The Fox Hat, I have to comment, sorry. Just how much adjustment do you do to your kit? Crikey, don't you think it suggests you should buy kit that works straight out of the shrink wrap?
JT, why would race boots do anything to your stance? My race boots are totally joyous for everyday skiing. maybe you have funny feet?
(apologies for the compound response)
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Murdoch wrote: |
Arno, I don't think there is an absolute limit, but eventually you get to a point where the marginal improvement per hour spent becomes very small. |
I think we're getting into metaphysics here
|
|
|
|
|
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
|
slikedges, No-one's learning curve is smooth. It's as previously mentioned on this thread, a series of terraces. Where and when the "leaps" come varies a lot as well. Re: carving - do try to look at the old videos. It was very rare to see the beginning of the curve carved. The end, yes, but almost everyone actually "turned" the skis to some degree. I thought I carved too - until I got carving skis!!!
David Murdoch, I think there is an absolute limit for most people in terms of skill. Not everyone has the actual ability to ski to top level, after that there's the question of time and dedication which is a bit different. I will never be as good as, say Rosie Mittermaier (someone of my generation) because, sadly I don't have that much talent (and not enough dedication etc either). I'd like to be, but goals must be achievable.
Race boots are generally very stiff and not particularly comfortable - in fact if they're the real thing they bl**dy well hurt all the time. I'm currently on Flexon Pros (which could be considered a race boot, but having skied on the real thing I know they're not!)
Brian did exactly that when they were out here - one run down the glacier pinched from the kids' lesson to give him some idea of where to go - but he's a pretty good skier anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Murdoch wrote: |
Wear The Fox Hat, I have to comment, sorry. Just how much adjustment do you do to your kit? Crikey, don't you think it suggests you should buy kit that works straight out of the shrink wrap? |
It's like "why have adjustable seats in cars?" Because everyone is different!
Ski boots are designed to fit reasonably well. But to get them fitted very well to your feet will take work.
Then there is the difference in ramp angles in bindings, so, for example, you may be perfectly balanced on Rossi Axial 120Ti bindings, but when you are on Tyrollia bindings, you'll find you are in the back. This is because Rossis tend to have a greater ramp angle, but Tyrollias are fairly neutral.
(we're getting into the real nitty-gritty here, but getting things done right does have a pay off)
|
|
|
|
|
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
|
David Murdoch wrote: |
brian, I see your point, but wonder whether just one little hours instruction might not reap terrific rewards. I know some teachers will do an hours private lesson from 0800hrs which might not get in the way of anything else (except the alpine hangover)?? |
David, I agree totally - and I find that taking lessons can also be part of the fun of the holiday, and not a chore, or something you don't have time for.
|
|
|
|
|
brian
brian
Guest
|
easiski, thanks. I was kind of mentally putting myself on at least a semi-advanced plateau
David Murdoch, easiski has pointed me in the right direction and I will be doing an hour or 2's instruction this winter once I've had a chance to practise a bit. It's not just the time for a lesson though, when you set out to improve something you require a fair bit of mental concentration and sometimes a couple of painful backward steps to go forward. I remember getting some golf lessons a few years ago after years as a happy hacker and while it did pay off, getting used to a "correct" grip and something more like a decent swing felt completely alien for a good while and I had to think hard every time I picked up the club.
Sometimes you just want to ski, if you know what I mean. It's a freedom thing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
brian, I do know what you mean!
Wear The Fox Hat, adjustable seats in cars is a bit like adjustable buckles on boot, non? I see what you mean but frankly hadn't heard of ramp angles until this forum. Maybe that's why I don't like my girlfriends P60s with Marker bindings? Fair point re getting things perfectly right though.
easiski, re carving, OK you might have a point. I can't visualise how I turned 8 years ago well enough to argue, but I'm sure you're judgement on this is better than mine!
Although, are we talking about slightly different things? Properly carved turns on skinny skis vs hanging on for the ride and letting shaped skis do all the work?
|
|
|
|
|
You know it makes sense.
|
David Murdoch,
I think very stiff Race boots would not work for a recreational skier as they may not be able to generate enough pressure to drive through the boot and this could hinder your ability to set your stance.
If you can't flex the ankles or bend the knees - whichever you prefer, because the boot is too stiff then that will set you back in your stance or hinder it.
Of course, if you ski fast enough then you may well generate enough force to ski a race boot. I tend to use the term Race to apply to professional racers and their kit, not what I call the marketing term 'race'. But if you can bend a race boot then no problems with using them.
I need a balance between comfort and peformance and my old Lange's were not at all comfortable...so I don't use very stiff boots anymore
|
|
|
|
|
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
|
David Murdoch wrote: |
Wear The Fox Hat, adjustable seats in cars is a bit like adjustable buckles on boot, non? I see what you mean but frankly hadn't heard of ramp angles until this forum. Maybe that's why I don't like my girlfriends P60s with Marker bindings? Fair point re getting things perfectly right though.
|
Well, you might not like her skis if the bindings were mounted forward (i.e. in the position more appropriate for female CoG)
But back to the seat analogy...
The buckles on a boot are like moving the seat forward and back, and changing the angle of the seatback.
What I'm talking about is raising or lowering the seat height, changing the lumbar support, moving the headrest, and (though this isn't part of the seat), moving the steering wheel.
The next level up from that is to go to a racing seat - moulded to fit your body, with a 5 point harness instead of a seat belt, etc, but since I'm not racing, I don't have that level of ski boot.
|
|
|
|
|
Poster: A snowHead
|
Wear The Fox Hat, What you say about ramp angles and so on is perfectly valid, and adjusting everything to suit you personally is definitely a bonus, especially when you ski a lot (I have conformable inner boots in the Flexons - cost an arm and a leg, but great). However all this stuff helps, but does not replace correct stanace etc. It may help you to achieve it, but if your stance and balance are good enough you should be able to pick up any boot/ski/binding mix and do it! (I don't say I'm in that league though!)
Years ago I remember Iain Finlayson ski-ing down the Cas on absolute sheet ice, soing beautiful turns when the rest of us were barely able to stand up. It later transpired that he was using an old pair of downhill skis that hadn't been sharpened or waxed for at least 3 years!! Wow!!
|
|
|
|
|
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
|
What is this with the female 'centre of gravity'? Is it proven to be different to a man's ? By how much ? Presumably they used a girl with a big bum and a nice slim guy ? What about a guy with a beer gut?
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
|
|
|
You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
|
easiski, ooooh, that must have been fun to watch. Big grins in front of my screen at the thought of it!
Wear The Fox Hat, nope, the bindings are mounted as normally directed. But... I feel centred on my Rossis whereas I have to move the sweet spot a bit forward on her P60s. No big deal, just not automatic (but then I've skied "centred" on Rossis for ages). Had no issues (as it happens) on Stocklis SL and GS skis last season with Vist bindings which I THINK have no added ramp angle (???)
And OK, take your point about fully adjustable seats, just not all cars have em. What you're doing is removing the seat, replacing the rails in a different place, moving the dashboard, etc... (I think). But, you're right. If you were optimising your car for performance and could do those thing, then you would wouldn't you... I guess I just haven't got round to it.
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
|
|
|
You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
|
Wear The Fox Hat, who's in the picture? I think it's Betty Rubble and Elvis Presley.
|
|
|
|
|
|
easiski wrote: |
However all this stuff helps, but does not replace correct stanace etc. |
How would you suggest correcting stance?
And yeah, the boy's CoG is interesting (as is his stance!)
|
|
|
|
|
|
My problem is that I can 'let go' and go fast on milder slopes but put me on a steep slope and I am always in snowplough trying to go slowly and not 'letting go' and it is the fear that's holding me back, fear of going faster and steeper. It's the fear of getting outside the comfort zone, and for me, fear of the unknown.
I think fear is a real problem and I wish there was a magic way to make it go away - it really does hold me back in all areas of life when my 'fear of the unknown' stops me from doing things I want to.
Just my little view on things there
julia
|
|
|
|
|
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
|
crazy_skier_jules, get someone to show you how to traverse a steep slope, that should make it easier for you
|
|
|
|
|
|
D G Orf, thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|