Poster: A snowHead
|
Ray Zorro, wow, I live near Gstaad, I'd no idea we were in the top 15, that's amazing. It's a nice area actually, little visited by Brit's, but ironically, I'd have said it was a bit low I guess those figures refer to Rougemont, that's a sub area of Gstaad with very reliabe snow.
|
|
|
|
|
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
|
Ray Zorro, thanks. Interesting that Risoul and Montgenèvre should figure so highly, given the disastrous season that they had last year!
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
|
|
|
You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
|
slikedges, no but you could have started by being polite You'd be hard pressed to find any other posts on this forum where the likes of "@rrsols" is applied to anyone. Without that, I wouldn't have reacted in the first place. This isn't Jwaz or Usenet.
It takes two to tango.
Last edited by You need to Login to know who's really who. on Fri 24-06-05 21:45; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
|
slikedges, there's the historical snow reports at SCGB - give the upper and lower snow depths week by week Nov-Apr for each of the last 11 years, and the weekly averages over all that period. As mentioned by someone earlier in the thread though this doesn't quite tell the whole story: you only need a few centimetres for decent skiing if the slopes are alpine meadow (e.g. Les Houches, Megeve?), but may need a metre or so if it's rocky mountainside (e.g. Argentiere).
|
|
|
|
|
You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
|
The advice to avoid the UK half term weeks is excellent. To go ski-ing in France in mid February if you don't have children is completely crazy. Spending half your day standing in lift queues, and the other half ducking and weaving down crowded pistes is no fun. It is also crazy, IMHO, to travel to and from resorts on a Saturday, unless you have no choice. Even in quiet weeks a burst of bad weather can cause Saturday travel delays which make grown men weep. Your generous budget should enable you to choose hotels which are more flexible (more likely to be found in Austria or Switzerland than France, I suspect) But if going to France you should avoid ALL the French holiday weeks (4 weeks, from the second week in Feb to the first week of March, inclusive, especially the Paris zone weeks). Loads of websites have the details. Also try to avoid New Year - crowded and often not very good snow. Book late if you can, but if you go at the end of January or the second week in March, you should be OK.
Lots of good advice on resorts above - and you will note that there is no consensus! I hope I will not provoke another outburst of bad temper by suggesting that the Chamonix valley is not a great choice for beginners. As you are keen to make good progress with ski-ing, the quality of instruction available should be a major determinant of where you go. Have private lessons or use a school which guarantees small groups (max 6). And get fit enough to enjoy it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I do think that ise was needlessly blunt in his replies to Cathy Coins earlier in this thread. I thought that it was overly defensive in reaction to someone who was only trying to be helpful in their replies. It seemed to me a case of sour grapes when she supplied the quotes to back up her assertions. I hope that she has not been put off posting by the reaction.
This is only my personal view, and not those of the moderators as a group.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I do actually agree with Kramer, up to a point. However, using Jwaz-style 'disguised' insults as put-downs can only ever exacerbate the situation. Fortunately it happens extremely rarely on snowHeads.
pam w wrote: |
To go ski-ing in France in mid February if you don't have children is completely crazy. Spending half your day standing in lift queues, and the other half ducking and weaving down crowded pistes is no fun ..... But if going to France you should avoid ALL the French holiday weeks (4 weeks, from the second week in Feb to the first week of March, inclusive, especially the Paris zone weeks) .... Also try to avoid New Year - crowded and often not very good snow. |
That's only part of Pam's quote, and the rest is fine - but it is possible to find quiet resorts to ski in France during the February holidays. You just have to avoid the 'classic' destinations. Even the French ski tourists are guilty of sticking to the biggies in the main. Plus there is a major difference between the two overlap weeks, where two of three French academic zones are on holiday simultaneously, and the first and last week of the Feb month, with just one academic zone off school.
As for the New Year, the Christmas week can be a bit crowded, perhaps not quite as much as Feb. Much depends on the snow conditions that early in the season, how many runs open, etc. Again it depends on where you go - I've usually managed to avoid queues over that period by choosing to ski in less traditional resorts, or using those parts of the bigger domains that few people find their way to.
|
|
|
|
|
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
|
PG, Fair enough. There's a quick, ill-considered, unguarded response for you . No real offence to the person was meant, just a sharp comment on the practice . Anyway, I can see offence could be reasonably taken, you're right it should be avoided, I apologise and withdraw it. I will edit the post accordingly.
GrahamN, I honestly do appreciate that already. It doesn't fully detract from my view though, does it? Is anyone who has the info to hand able to make a more definitive statement?
Edit: PG, I just read your last post. Stop sniping at me unless you want to exacerbate this. You've had your say. I've accepted the only relevant bit.
Last edited by You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net. on Sat 25-06-05 8:31; edited 3 times in total
|
|
|
|
|
|
slikedges, regarding availability of historical snow reports, on that website that I gave, you can check only the last three years for any particular week of the season on a country by country basis. (Though I am not sure whether or not they have been updated to include this year). As GrahamN says, the SCGB has records that cover the last 12 seasons, however they can only be accessed by members. The rest of us can only see last year's figures. I am not aware of other available sources - but it would be useful to know.
|
|
|
|
|
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
|
slikedges, I was responding directly to Kramer's slightly - imo - one-sided comment. My comment preceded your withdrawal of the word in question. This exchange wouldn't have happened in the first place with a more restrained use of language. It's rather ironic that you should now be getting on your high horse.
Before your edit I was about to propose a respectful truce. I stick with that offer.
|
|
|
|
|
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
|
Quote: |
It's rather ironic that you should now be getting on your high horse.
|
Indeed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
WOW - what a response. Its going to take me ages to digest all this information!
OK, firstly the debate about Austria or France - I don't know either, but I would be inclined to choose France, not because there is anything wrong with Austria, but because if all the tour companies are pushing us to France there will be more British people there and therefore:
A) more demand for English speaking Ski Schools, which for a beginner like me I think is a very good idea - skiing might be hard enough without a language barrier to contend with.
and
B) more British people that we can meet and compare notes with and build up Friendships.
So on the basis that it is France I have narrowed it down to three/four places:
La Plagne/ Les Arcs - the cable car between the two sounds like you get a good deal staying in either
Courcheval - gets a lot of recommendations but doesn't seem to appear on any of the "best for beginners" lists - is this right?
La Rosiere - Don't know much about this resort, so need to read some more on it.
I haven't mentioned Flaine, which appears on these "best for beginners" lists, but lots of reviews criticise it for being a bit charmless and for the apres ski being a bit dull - is this right?
Oh and in terms of date, I am quite flexible - late Jan, Feb or early March are all OK - what is the last week in Feb like? Do places run Saturday to Saturday or does it vary?
Let me know what you think, I'd love to know.
And once again, thanks for all your responses, I have been really impressed by this site, so much better than any of the other sites I have come across and so welcoming, it is making me look forward to my trip even more.
Thanks
Kos
|
|
|
|
|
You know it makes sense.
|
Goodness me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Boys, boys ........ the poor newcomer asked advice about where to go for his first holiday, he also stated the wish to go in February and to stay in a chalet so he and the Mrs could enjoy quiet wine-filled evenings in agreeable company. The thread has turned into a "where's best, and where do I like best, and the rest of you are nuts" sort of thing.
Note: Although I'm EXTREMELY biased towards LDA (naturally) I actually recommended another resort as being more suitable to the poor gentleman's needs. Here's a newcomer - let's try to give genuine advice based on his requirements!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
|
Kramer wrote: |
I do think that ise was needlessly blunt in his replies to Cathy Coins earlier in this thread. I thought that it was overly defensive in reaction to someone who was only trying to be helpful in their replies. It seemed to me a case of sour grapes when she supplied the quotes to back up her assertions. I hope that she has not been put off posting by the reaction.
This is only my personal view, and not those of the moderators as a group. |
Remarkable, she kicked off by accusing me a making a mountain out of molehill, being unfriendly, dismissed my objection to the premise there was poor snow in Austria as disproportionate, being tiresome, a grumpy old man, a called me patronising and it goes on. I don't really mind, the sound of sacred cows running amok doesn't much bother me.
It's the same old story as far as I can tell, there's an orthodoxy to UK skiing which sends them to the same half dozen ski stations, if any of the preposterous myths are questioned there's an hysterical over reaction each time. Why there's such an extreme intolerance of other peoples views is beyond me.
What are we supposed to do? What slikedges posted was wrong. Are we supposed not to answer? What's the point? As DB appeared to correctly guess immediately, slikedges lacked any direct experience to make these claims, so how useful or helpful was that advice? The rest of it looked reasonable enough, but how are we to tell? If the first bit was third hand recyled myths how do we validate the rest?
I think some of need to be a bit more certain who's trying to help and who's just repeating something they've heard to demonstrate their insider status.
For the original question, you've got three guys living in the French Alps, Swiss Alps and the Austrian Alps respectively, the clear consensus was the majority of UK skiers are missing out with their choice of the same half dozen stations.
easiski wrote: |
Here's a newcomer - let's try to give genuine advice based on his requirements!!!! |
Yes, of course, but maybe we should add the words "and our own personal experience" to the end of that? Maybe we could get a few more posters then as well, if people felt their own experience was the most, if not only, important aspect of their reply and not the requirement to appear knowledgeable.
|
|
|
|
|
Poster: A snowHead
|
ise, I'm not going to get into a he said, she said arguement with you, I'm just stating how it seemed to me, looking in from the outside.
|
|
|
|
|
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
|
easiski, some sensible words at last, you'd think we were trying to scare new members away. kosciosco, I love La Rosiere, and think it would be ideal for you.
Plenty of chalets, quiet but sociable at night, nice lunches. What more could you want?
Apart from Serre Chevalier of course, but mid-Feb next Winter will be seriously busy due to Turin Olympics, and I've heard rumours of ridiculous prices being charged for studios.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
|
kosciosco, in terms of language I found no problem with English tuition in Austria, Westendorf is popular with the Irish and Soll - also on Ski Welt is very English oriented. The Austrians were more into separating classes by language, whilst in Saas Fee and Val Cenis (quite a small French resort), classes appeared more likely to be dual language (this impression is based on a very small sample size). I think you'll find a number of people here who'd recommend native English speakers as the best option for teaching.
If you go somewhere like Courchevel - i.e. part of big ski area, you'll probably find some snowHeads knocking around. When we've been to the 3 valleys, which Courchevel belongs to, we've stayed in Val Thorens, mainly because it is the highest and we've gone around Easter. I've been put off Courchevel by the price.
Most tour ops run Saturday to Saturday, but a few run Sunday to Sunday - I think others have experience of this.
|
|
|
|
|
You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
|
|
|
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
|
Hey Kramer, that's fine, I'm not that sensitive - I was brought up in the SCGB school of hard knocks after all. You get a much better class of selective quoting, misrepresenting and talking down to there! But you wonder why lurkers don't post when you get pounced on like that? Everything everyone says is just their opinion and is valid for that - this is a forum not a court of law. I am just sorry such a stupid argument erupted - I don't come here to argue, I can go to SCGB for that.
|
|
|
|
|
You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
|
kosciosco, I won't comment on Austria vs. France as I've never skied in Austria.
With regard to the resorts you mention, my thoughts are:
Les Arcs: where I learnt to ski. They used to teach using the 'ski evolutif' method - starting on short skis and progressing to longer ones as the week goes on. I don't know if they still do that. I found it very effective for the first week. I would recommend 1800 to stay in but I don't have any experience of the new 1950.
La Plagne: lots of easy skiing but split into many small villages - some hideous, some a bit quiet. Belle Plagne is the village I would pick.
Courchevel: Masses of easy slopes to build confidence on. 1850 is the livliest area but it's also relatively expensive; I hear good things about 1650 but I've never stayed there. Part of the enourmous Trois Vallees area but that really isn't important for your first week.
La Rosiere: never been there but there are plenty of people around here who can advise you.
Flaine: Skiing is good and there is plenty for beginners. However, the architecture is dreadful and nightlife almost non-existant. I wouldn't recommend it for a first trip - there are plenty of better places. (Actually I quite like the way the resort 'dissappears' when viewed from a distance - the bare concrete seems to merge with the background). From a distance is best!
Of the ones you've listed, I'd pick Courchevel 1850 if you can get an affordable trip. Last week in January is a good time to go to get good snow (usually), cheaper prices and avoid the February crowds. If Courchevel is too expensive, I'd pick Les Arcs 1800.
All IMHO, of course
|
|
|
|
|
|
kosciosco, IF you decide on La Plagne, I'd echo Alistair's plug for Belle Plagne. The ESF school for beginners is right in the village. Ski-in Ski-out from almost all properties and no car traffic in BP. Once you can move around a little there are loads of easy wide blues. It's the prettiest and almost the highest of the LP villages but is not noted for night life. Just a few bars and restaurants. But you weren't looking for action.
Chalet Balcons might suit you - it's not quite a traditional chalet - more of a multistorey block that looks like an overgrown chalet with several T.O.s handling different bits of it. Some have jaccuzzis in the bathrooms. Maitre Canter (the pub / restaurant next door) is quite lively around sundown (happy hours). Mind you, come to think of it all the chalets in BP are at least 3 storey buildings. Old, wooden built and rustic they are not.
As a first timer, honestly you are unlikely to need the Vanoise Express cable car. Either Les Arcs or La Plagne on it's own will give more than enough scope. You can always buy a single day upgrade if you just want to go over for the ride.
Enjoy your 1st time and if you can do some dry slope or snow dome instruction before you go it will make your first few days so much more enjoyable and productive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actually Cathy I would say that in the vast majority of cases newcomers are encouraged to post precisely because while lurking, they have been able to observe the prompt, detailed, accurate and friendly advice regulars endeavour to provide. A very large proportion of that advice comes from the major posters to this forum, both because they're fortunate enough to have the information at their fingertips and also because they are more than happy to spend a lot of time sharing their knowledge with fellow members.
That is no excuse for being uncivil, but on the very rare occasion frustration creeps through it's never with the newbie... and everyone has the occasional off day!
Valid points have been made all round in this thread. I sympathise with both points of view, but believe it's a real concern that misleading information may sometimes be innocently provided, as here with respect to Austria. This coming from someone with every interest to encourage people to visit France, and Les Arcs in particular, as well.
|
|
|
|
|
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
|
PG wrote
Quote: |
it is possible to find quiet resorts to ski in France during the February holidays. You just have to avoid the 'classic' destinations.
|
I dare say it IS possible to find quiet resorts in France in the February holidays, but I can't agree that you just have to avoid the "classic destinations". Our apartment is in Les Saisies, which is about as unclassic as you can get; it is rare to hear any English spoken on the slopes and you will not always be able to buy a skipass if you don't have at least a few words of French. But the last week in February and first week in March (the paris weeks last year) are very busy, with substantial lift queues and a lot of jostling and Parisian style hassle and aggro, unheard of at other times of the year. We were warned off these weeks by locals, who can't stand them. Outside the French holiday times queues are unheard of, ski lessons very cheap, life is generally more pleasant. Same applies to Arly valley - e.g. Praz sur Arly, Notre Dame de Bellecombe (to both of which we will be lift linked next season). In fact, my experience has been that the Frenchier the place, the greater the contrast - because places like Meribel (the least French of the lot???) have lots of British packages coming in during late January and mid March - when the Frenchiest resorts are virtually deserted, thanks to the extraordinary herd instincts of French tourists. I have queued for lifts in the 3 Valleys in mid January.
However, I strongly agree with those who have recommended La Rosiere, Les Gets and Courchevel as great for beginners. Courchevel 1650 is my favourite because it's got a lot of quiet pistes, being out on a bit of a limb, but 1800 is better for beginners, if you can afford it. The big nursery slope near the Altiport (can't remember the name) must be one of the best in the world, as wide as two football pitches, long gentle slope, lifts up both sides. If you can't afford 1800, as I never could, there are good skibus links with 1650. When I did ski lessons with New Generation I had to bus up from 1650 to the meeting place at 1800 because the slightly tortuous route on skis was not possible in the time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
pam w wrote: |
PG wrote
Quote: |
it is possible to find quiet resorts to ski in France during the February holidays. You just have to avoid the 'classic' destinations.
|
I dare say it IS possible to find quiet resorts in France in the February holidays, but I can't agree that you just have to avoid the "classic destinations". Our apartment is in Les Saisies, which is about as unclassic as you can get; it is rare to hear any English spoken on the slopes and you will not always be able to buy a skipass if you don't have at least a few words of French. But the last week in February and first week in March (the paris weeks last year) are very busy, with substantial lift queues and a lot of jostling and Parisian style hassle and aggro, unheard of at other times of the year. We were warned off these weeks by locals, who can't stand them. Outside the French holiday times queues are unheard of, ski lessons very cheap, life is generally more pleasant. Same applies to Arly valley - e.g. Praz sur Arly, Notre Dame de Bellecombe (to both of which we will be lift linked next season). In fact, my experience has been that the Frenchier the place, the greater the contrast - because places like Meribel (the least French of the lot???) have lots of British packages coming in during late January and mid March - when the Frenchiest resorts are virtually deserted, thanks to the extraordinary herd instincts of French tourists. I have queued for lifts in the 3 Valleys in mid January.
|
But isn't Les Saises extremely popular as a schools destination? As is Crest Voland? I've not been to either for, I think, three seasons, but they're always busy with kids when I went.
A great ski area though with excellent scenery and a couple of excellent moutain restaurants as I recall with access to some inter resort excursions and a good example of an area largely unknown to most UK skiers.
|
|
|
|
|
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
|
pam w, no argument from me that the Chamonix valley is not an ideal location for beginners. As it happens, I did pretty much all my early skiing there, loved every minute of it, and would ski there in preference to the majority of other places I've been, but would certainly not recommend it for beginners in general. I only mentioned those places in connection with the side-discussion on snow depth as examples with which I'm familar of different terrain types.
kosciosco, I've been to Flaine a couple of times and love it as an excellent introduction to off-piste. I don't think it's quite as charmless as is sometimes made out, but it's certainly not chocolate box - and to say the night-life is limited is probably still being generous. You are probably almost certainly right to avoid it for now - save it up for when you're looking for some more intermediate/advanced progression. If you were interested in that area though Samoens is probably the more appropriate area for a beginner (wider open pistes, prettier village, good gondola up to the pistes, not really ski-in/out, no idea about accommodation/night-life I'm afraid), but ise is probably the expert here on that Grand Massif area. I went to Les Arcs (Arc 1800) about 6 years ago, really quite liked it, but the topography does rather channel you into a single pinch point to get between the two valleys although that may not be so noticeable if you're only getting started. I also found it as charmless as Flaine and equally poor night-life (although we didn't look particularly hard). Courchevel is a big wide open valley, easy to get around, and has a huge range of levels of skiing. It is quite expensive, but probably the best starting point of these you've listed. At New Year I don't think I spent longer than about 3 minutes in any lift queue in the Courchevel valley, but maybe I was just lucky (there were some horrible queues for gondolas over in Meribel and Val Thorens though). La Tania is connected to Courchevel, a bit quieter and cheaper, with some nice chalets that can be virtually ski-in/out, but you do have essentially a single lift/piste to take to make the connection to Courchevel at the beginning end of the day, or a once an hour bus around the bottom of the hill. I've not been to La Ros or La Plagne, or pretty much anywhere in Austria so can't comment on those.
If you're going to get some early instruction prior to heading off to the mountains, try to do it at at all possible at a snow dome rather than at a dry slope. (Edit - re-reading your first post I see you're intending to go to MK, so that's OK then ) I'd not skied on a dry slope until this year - as I'd been scared off by the stories of injuries sustained. While basically the same techniques do apply as on snow, it does feel very different, and I can confirm (through extensive practical research on the subject ) that falling over on the stuff does hurt like hell - and I've had plenty of experience of falling over on snow as well for comparison purposes. Apparently there is something called "Dendix Thumb" (scars from the reattachment operations etc), which most long-timers take inordinate pleasure in showing off. I've not skied on Permasnow which is now appearing on many dry slopes (e.g. most of those run by Nike), but that is supposed to be much less prone to cause injury (although providing less grip for the skis - but that's probably not a problem for the beginner).
ise, FWIW I had exactly the same reaction as Kramer. If slikedges and Cathy Coins were wrong, it would probably have been more helpful to have brought some evidence to demonstrate their error, as you did from 11am Friday - rather than spend the previous 24hours simply sniping at them (and not answering kosciosco). Try re-reading this thread and think whether you could not have made your case better.
Last edited by snowHeads are a friendly bunch. on Sat 25-06-05 15:36; edited 2 times in total
|
|
|
|
|
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
|
pam w, would hardly call the Saisies/Crest link domain with 100 miles of marked runs an unknown! Incredibly popular with the Parisians as well. I referred to the classic destinations as including those popular with both the British and the French. Most big city French ski tourists, with the notable exception of the Marseillais, Bordelais and Toulousains, head for the Savoie/Haute Savoie.
I was thinking of much smaller French village domains, running into the hundreds, that are virtually all skiable at that time of year, beside which Les Saisies would seem to be a mega resort! Over the course of a week, by being valley-based say in Barcelonnette in the southern French Alps, you could have a wonderful skiing experience visiting 4 or 5 nearby resorts, and rarely have to queue. I know it's possible because I've done it, several times.
Last edited by And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports. on Sat 25-06-05 16:00; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
|
GrahamN wrote: |
ise, FWIW I had exactly the same reaction as Kramer. If slikedges and Cathy Coins were wrong, it would probably have been more helpful to have brought some evidence to demonstrate their error, as you did from 11am Friday - rather than spend the previous 24hours simply sniping at them (and not answering kosciosco). Try re-reading this thread and think whether you could not have made your case better. |
Would it not be more effective if we refrained from posting things we'd made up or heard from a bloke in the pub and then presented as fact? I realise I'm running against the broad sweep of modern society in this but it would be a nice change.
|
|
|
|
|
You know it makes sense.
|
You believe that most of "modern society" makes things up or repeats gossip?
Speak for yourself. I believe most people tell the truth, and therefore trust each other's word.
|
|
|
|
|
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
|
David Goldsmith wrote: |
You believe that most of "modern society" makes things up or repeats gossip?
|
Yes, I beleive your entire country is run by a guy who can't distinguish between his opinion and reality, which you seem to forget you also think And he's only a product of his age.
|
|
|
|
|
Poster: A snowHead
|
ise, well, actually, that's a rather different point!
Do I hear the sound of screeching skis, in a rapid U-turn?
|
|
|
|
|
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
|
What's a different point is to talk in terms of truth, it's an ambiguous concept at best. However, in those terms, I'm simply distinguishing between information that someone believes is true and information they know is correct. I happen to prefer the latter and I also think SH has an such an abundance of the latter that we can do without the former in many cases.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
|
Yes, but you were implying that because "our entire country" is run by a
scheming, duplicitous, war-mongering, snake oil merchant [my words]
that we are all careless with the truth too.
Well, I don't think we are.
|
|
|
|
|
You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
|
ise, is the difference that everyone else believes their opinion to be true, and yet you know that yours is correct?
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
|
David Goldsmith, he's a product of his time, he appealed to the public initially because he seemed to represent the values, lifestyles and mindset that "middle England" did, the part of the country that provided a few hundred thousand extra managers for the NHS and so enthusiastically mismanages large parts of the economy.
We're way, way off topic, but, I said nothing of the sort, and I presented two positions, "distinguishing between information that someone believes is true and information they know is correct", I most certainly made no reference to "truth" or accused anyone, Tony included, of being a liar. They always think it's true
My personal rule of thumb is that if something needs believing in there's a good chance it's not true (with apologies to organised religion of course)
I presumed, naively, you meant you'd made a U turn
|
|
|
|
|
You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
|
|
|
|
kosciosco, I wouldn't expect there to be much to choose between Austria and France on the question of English spoken in ski schools and English people arund to chat to; if it's in a Uk brochure, it'll be crawling with Brits.
I've skiied in Flaine but not stayed there, it's a modern resort, and notone of the better designed ones, but the skiing should be great for you. No idea about the apres ski other than what I've read, which is that it's not notably good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
richmond wrote: |
I've skiied in Flaine but not stayed there, it's a modern resort, and notone of the better designed ones, but the skiing should be great for you. No idea about the apres ski other than what I've read, which is that it's not notably good. |
Trouble is we all mean different things by apres of course, there's a couple of bars and restaurants, good enough for me but not everyone. You can get Guinness or Murphy's on tap which is nice
|
|
|
|
|
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
|
|
|
|
I don't think that you can beat Austria for apres ski, although my only experience has been St Anton and Lech and Zurs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|