 Poster: A snowHead
|
Oh well , I failed to get my points across. Never mind. This was meant to be a set of opinions on skis not a learned review.
Sorry I confusedslikedges, stuarth, comprex, and others.
I should have clearly stated all the relevant details at the beginning of the first post. To set the record straight.
Age : 50 (at the time), Male, 1st Year, Ht 1.80, Wt 77-81 Kg, 46 days (just added up) experience and c 70-ish hours private tuition. S& R level 6 ...
I'm afraid I can not explain conditions other than it was Spring ..... and ranged between icy (in the morning) and slushy on the lower slopes in the afternoon. It would be inappropriate for me to use other terms I have ' seen like 'windblown'/'crud'/'marbles'/'hardpack'/'Wet Powder' etc. I may have skied them but do not know precisely to what conditions they refer. Each ski was used for at least 1-day ( apart from the M9) on all pistes from Blue to Black ... and in the limited (foot deep on occasion) powder off piste. No moguls as I dislike them !
'Style' and I are seldom used in the same sentence - and definitely not when alluding to fashion or BB content! Yes , it was badly written and PG, is correct to warn of the dangers of believinglet alone acting upon any content written by non-experts here. Only defense it that it was 'honest' opinion/rubbish. I have changed my tagline. No more inappropriate than others ( who have not posted here) who respond to questions in order to further commercial interest when that interest is not clear?
slikedges, stuarth, maggi, M80euf, ise, Those are my feelings about the S & R scale and I share a healthy scepticsm ( Ok, I am a cynical old git!) on manufacturer's product ranges. Surely any real scale should be linear and it obvious to me that I should only be a 2 or 3 on any true scale looking at other skiers and watching a couple of races .. The S& R scale between 1 - 7 looks like a 'Beginner' scale to me. I describe myself as an Advanced Beginner ---
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
|
eEvans, i pretty much share your views on reviews. i just think we need a way of knowing the level/demographics of the reviewer or, believe me, the review will be next to useless. i mean, even skiers of similar weight and level can completely disagree on a ski as it just doesnt suit. 
BTW see the daughter thread I spawned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
|
|
slikedges, I think we just need more reviews. Those reviews need to be lightweight though, the danger is this turns into EpicSki where reviews are a combination of bewildering, pointless technical jargon and nonsense and gung-ho rubbish about the terrain. If we had less of this, and not just in the context of skis, then we might have more regular contributors and a little more diversity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
|
ise, couldn't agree more 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
|
|
ise, slikedges consider that archive searchers may not even see who is posting a review, not being members. I don't ask for jargon or gung-ho rubbish, merely items like: spring snow, long turns on red pistes & size of skier. Is that not reasonable?
|
|
|
|
|
|
You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
|
|
Yes. A balance. No relating of exploits. No descriptive scene setting. It's got to be succinct to be useful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last edited by Then you can post your own questions or snow reports... on Wed 5-03-25 0:08; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
|
|
|
|
|
|
My questions used to be:
1) Are they Salomon?
2) Have I just broken my old skis?
3) Are they a fashionable pink colour?
But thanks to snowheads they are:
1) How am I going to pretend these arnt Salomons if I get to the next EOSB?
2) and 3) unchanged... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
|
|
Last edited by snowHeads are a friendly bunch. on Wed 5-03-25 0:07; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
|
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You know it makes sense.
|
| stuarth wrote: |
| eEvans wrote: |
Simple questions , I hope.
1) How do you judge whether bases and edges are 'solid' ?
|
Warning - non-expert answer coming up!!
I'd say that the construction has a lot to do with it.
My Volkls are a wonder of German engineering, as someone I skied with said - "they are made of Tiger tanks!" They have a really thick P-tex base and really fat, well attached edges.
|
Just goes to show how it varies through the range though, my 5*'s have a wafer thin base.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
I was expecting a core shot (big hole in the base material ripped through to the core material), and some detached edge, however I was pleased to see only a big gouge (easily filled and flattened with a base grind) and all edges intact after a friend was kind enough to return it to me. 
These are truly solid skis - I think if I'd done the same on my 1080s (which I have previously core shotted and ripped out an edge) The rock would have come through the topsheet! (graphics on top)