Ski Club 2.0 Home
Snow Reports
FAQFAQ

Mail for help.Help!!

Log in to snowHeads to make it MUCH better! Registration's totally free, of course, and makes snowHeads easier to use and to understand, gives better searching, filtering etc. as well as access to 'members only' forums, discounts and deals that U don't even know exist as a 'guest' user. (btw. 50,000+ snowHeads already know all this, making snowHeads the biggest, most active community of snow-heads in the UK, so you'll be in good company)..... When you register, you get our free weekly(-ish) snow report by email. It's rather good and not made up by tourist offices (or people that love the tourist office and want to marry it either)... We don't share your email address with anyone and we never send out any of those cheesy 'message from our partners' emails either. Anyway, snowHeads really is MUCH better when you're logged in - not least because you get to post your own messages complaining about things that annoy you like perhaps this banner which, incidentally, disappears when you log in :-)
Username:-
 Password:
Remember me:
👁 durr, I forgot...
Or: Register
(to be a proper snow-head, all official-like!)

Mid-fat skis, Head Monsters/Volkl ACs

 Poster: A snowHead
Poster: A snowHead
Eeeeezy now!

Greetz to y'all, first post here n'all that, hope youre all having a good season so far...

So im looking for i guess whats called a good mid-fat ski. Im 11st and about 5'10 and ski pretty hard, fast and aggressive on piste but i want smt that will work off piste too.

Im off to St. Anton in Jan and ive got a lesson with pistetopowder, the girl there said smt with 82mm underfoot would be great but imho that would be way too fat for ripping up pistes which at the end of off the day, is what ill be doing 90% of the time.

Ive had my eye on the Head Monster iM76 (119/76/105) and the Volkl AC3 motion (117/72/103) for a while and ill prob end up with one of them, has anyone ever used/owned/demoed either of these models? The AC seems too skinny to be considered a mid fat but if i believe the marketing blurb then its perfect for what i need...yet im really struggling to believe a few mm here and there makes such a whopping difference...

Bah...so confusing! And am i just being a dumbski or, with the exception of the epicski forum, is there absolutely jack 5h1t on the web for good ski reviews...?

Cheers guyz n'gals

Shiva
snow conditions
 Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Quote:

but imho that would be way too fat for ripping up pistes which at the end of off the day, is what ill be doing 90% of the time.


This is where you're wrong. Something like a blizzard 8.1 or 8.7, magfire 82 Xti, AC30 and AC50 are all great piste ski's.
I see little use for a 7x mm ski these days.

You mention you want to go more off piste but still cling to your 90% piste profile and fall back to a skinny 7x mm piste ski. If you pick a good 8x ski, you'll find you give up nearly nothing on piste and gain a lot off piste.

ps: amusing how you mention EpicSki, you should really read up a bit there. I don't think I've ever seen a sub 80mm ski recommended there. Pretty much every 'one ski quiver' question these days gets a 82-90mm (east coast) or 90mm+ answer. Not to mention that one of the topics recently over there should hold your profile+answer.
latest report
 Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
I'm in the iM82 and there is nothing they can't do on-piste if you're strong enough. Smile
snow report
 You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
Quote:

Im off to St. Anton in Jan and ive got a lesson with pistetopowder, the girl there said smt with 82mm underfoot would be great but imho that would be way too fat for ripping up pistes which at the end of off the day, is what ill be doing 90% of the time.


I've been really suprised how good modern mid fat skis are on piste, I think its more important that the overall stats suit you. I have a pair of K2 Xplorer (128, 84, 112) they are suprisingly good on piste, with a decent amount of float in powder.
snow conditions
 Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
The difference between my regular slalom ski (65mm) and my 'mid-fat' (Elan Magfire 12, 76mm) is huge for on piste performance. No matter how well I ski I don't get the same response out of the Elans as I do out of the slalom ski. I've skied the Head Peak 76 (this season's replacement for the Monster I think) but only indoors and I thought they were even worse for short radius turns. I therefore don't agree with the advice that going up to 80+ won't sacrifice piste performance.
snow report
 You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
Cheers for the interesting feedback guys!

I dunno why but i was just working on the assumption that 80mm + would comprimise piste performance but you seem to be saying otherwise...im not a big guy and i just imagined that 80mm+ would be too much for smooth edge to edge carving.

I'll get over to epicski and see what i can find...

Cheers fellas!
ski holidays
 Then you can post your own questions or snow reports...
Then you can post your own questions or snow reports...
shiva_71 wrote:
I dunno why but i was just working on the assumption that 80mm + would comprimise piste performance

It does, in my experience.
ski holidays
 After all it is free Go on u know u want to!
After all it is free Go on u know u want to!
If you compare it to a 67mm SL ski which you only do SL type turns with, agreed.
(The new magfire 82 xti (82mm) actually has a bit smaller radius than your 12 (76mm).)

Piste performance is more than small SL turns imo. Anyway, obviously you're going to give up something if you compare it to a ski with which you can barely float (exaggeration, I know) in powder.
Would you recommend a 67mm SL ski to someone who wants to venture more in offpiste but keep piste performance?
ski holidays
 You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
Vorda wrote:
Would you recommend a 67mm SL ski to someone who wants to venture more in offpiste but keep piste performance?

No, I think something 75 - 80mm would be about right (that's what I ski on most of the time), but I was simply putting a differing opinion to that expressed that an 80+ ski would not significantly compromise piste performance (shorts or longs). IME it compromises that performance significantly. Performance from edge to edge, pop out of the turns and short radius abilities are all compromised, IMO.
snow conditions
 Ski the Net with snowHeads
Ski the Net with snowHeads
Quote:

I see little use for a 7x mm ski these days.

You mention you want to go more off piste but still cling to your 90% piste profile and fall back to a skinny 7x mm piste ski. If you pick a good 8x ski, you'll find you give up nearly nothing on piste and gain a lot off piste.



Can someone please explain what the above quote is referring to, I don't understand the bit about 7x and 8x
snow report
 snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
7x = 70-79,
8x = 80-89
snow conditions
 And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
stoatsbrother, Ahh...Thanks that makes more sense I was reading it as 7 times and 8 times Duhhh....... Embarassed
latest report
 So if you're just off somewhere snowy come back and post a snow report of your own and we'll all love you very much
So if you're just off somewhere snowy come back and post a snow report of your own and we'll all love you very much
Quote:

Can someone please explain what the above quote is referring to, I don't understand the bit about 7x and 8x


I think he means 70 something mm and 80 something mm underfoot width, if that isnt confusing too!

The Volkl AC30 according to the website is for "advanced to experts" which im not 100% sure about regarding my own level, also it says 50/50 on/off piste which again is pushing it a bit...

I guess i could demo stuff in St. Anton which would be fine but im kinda on a budget of say 350 euros max and im not overly optimistic ill find smt in this price range.

But thanks guys, it seems that i should be heading closer to 80mm than 70mm so that narrows the hunt a bit...just a thought tho, why is this whole subject always 100% about the underfoot width, surely wider tips and tails increase total surface area of the ski and thus give more float in powder...?

Tschuss!
latest report
 You know it makes sense.
You know it makes sense.
So by the above description my new chrissy presents are mid-fats - they are 123-78-105, my others were 121 / 73 / 103. In terms of geometry there seems little difference (though I do know the new ones will likely be a fair bit stiffer, they are also 8cm longer), will 5mm underfoot make a huge difference in how they ski? I have held both pairs up against each other and I must admit there is not a huge physical difference between the two skis.
latest report
 Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
Megamum wrote:
will 5mm underfoot make a huge difference in how they ski?

Not a major difference I don't think.
snow conditions
 Poster: A snowHead
Poster: A snowHead
Megamum, not really very fat. Ski instructors & Gate Junkies might see them as being so... Wink

Unless you really are committing to Off-Piste and powder should be fine though.
ski holidays
 Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
stoatsbrother, Nope no committment to either Laughing though I guess if I ever needed to its good to know that they would cope. What I am hoping is that they might have the characteristic I noticed when tried some skis from Elans Spice line in a test - the skis were heavier and wider than my Wave Magics and made skiing slush and heavier mounded up snow much easier. The Wave Magics, tended to get chucked round on it, but, the heavier wider skis almost seemed to cut/bash through it and came into their own in making that sort of surface, which I had found awkward beforehand, far easier to ski. If the new skis have similar characteristics this would be good news I think.
ski holidays
 Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Megamum, what are your new skis???
snow conditions
 You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
rob@rar wrote:
The difference between my regular slalom ski (65mm) and my 'mid-fat' (Elan Magfire 12, 76mm) is huge for on piste performance. No matter how well I ski I don't get the same response out of the Elans as I do out of the slalom ski. I've skied the Head Peak 76 (this season's replacement for the Monster I think) but only indoors and I thought they were even worse for short radius turns. I therefore don't agree with the advice that going up to 80+ won't sacrifice piste performance.


Agreed, however I don't think you loose that much more piste performance going from a mid-high 70mm ski to a >80mm ski. My everyday ski is the Magfire 10 and I have also skied the Magfire 12 quite regularly. I have hired Elan SLX slalom skis for a week and they were so much more fun than the Magfires on piste. I am now skiing Volkl Karmas (88mm) and Icelantic Pilgrims (90mm) as my main ski and I think the difference between the Magfires and the SLXs was more than between the Magfires and the Karmas or Pilgrims which are fun on piste as long as there is fresh snow. The only time I don't like them is if there has been no fresh snow and the pistes are very hard, then they're just boring. So if I wanted something to help me off piste I would buy something around 80-90mm and then use something superskinny for on-piste days
ski holidays
 Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
shiva_71, Elan Magfire 78 Ti in a 168cm
latest report
 You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
lynseyf, I don't disagree with any of that (I also have a pair of the Elan SLX slalom skis and the Karmas, and the fattest skis in my quiver are a pair of High Society Freerides which are 92mm IIRC). I think it's best to choose a ski which is suitable for the majority of what you will be skiing - going fat will compromise piste performance, going skinny will compromise off-piste performance. Aim for a ski which will minimise the compromises you have to make, and perhaps hire something completely different when the conditions demand it.
snow report
 Then you can post your own questions or snow reports...
Then you can post your own questions or snow reports...
lynseyf, going back to the OP, he did say he'd be ripping up the pistes 90% of the day...
snow report
 After all it is free Go on u know u want to!
After all it is free Go on u know u want to!
shiva_71, there are some Volkl AC40s listed on fleabay.co.uk at the moment. 170s with 125/82/110 dimensions. May not be of much help if you're in Austria Puzzled .

With a budget of around 350euros you could also check out www.sport-conrad.de. They are showing some AC50s(125-85-112) in the alpine/discontinued section.

Probably much better if you can demo something before you buy though.

ps. I have some K2 apache recons 80mm underfoot and i find them great on piste. Very Happy good luck.
snow report
 You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
I must admit I'm always surprised when folks say that they even get on with some of Kiwi_1's Icelantics on piste - they always look huge underfoot to me (regardless of model) and def. off piste weapons to my un-initiated eye.
latest report
 Ski the Net with snowHeads
Ski the Net with snowHeads
slikedges wrote:
lynseyf, going back to the OP, he did say he'd be ripping up the pistes 90% of the day...


He's a bit confused it seems.
Quote:
but i want smt that will work off piste too.


Quote:
ripping up pistes which at the end of off the day, is what ill be doing 90% of the time.


First figure out what exactly you want to ski in the near future.
snow conditions
 snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
Megamum wrote:
I must admit I'm always surprised when folks say that they even get on with some of Kiwi_1's Icelantics on piste - they always look huge underfoot to me (regardless of model) and def. off piste weapons to my un-initiated eye.


I ski 173 Icelantic Shaman which have a 15m radius and are unbelievable on piste (for a fat ski). No comparison to my 67mm waisted slalom ski of course, but as long as you are a solid skier technically and not a weakling, they're super fun for carving groomers between bowls.

shiva_71 my mid-fats are 08/09 im82's. If you're strong enough you can do any radius turn you want on piste and they LOVE to carve medium/long radius. As for off piste I skiied 35c's of fresh on them only a few days ago and they performed admirably. Shame about the graphics this year though... green was much nicer, not that this should alter your decision of course.
snow report
 And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
shiva_71, If you only want a fatter ski for a one day lesson why don't you just hire something for one day?
snow report
 So if you're just off somewhere snowy come back and post a snow report of your own and we'll all love you very much
So if you're just off somewhere snowy come back and post a snow report of your own and we'll all love you very much
Thanks again guys for your thoughts and feedback...dont really know much about the Elan Magfire line but seems like it could be another one to add to the list, i recall the Nordica Hot Rods got great reviews a few years back too.

Alexandra, yeah that would seem preferable to making a hasty purchase wouldnt it? Ive emailed Jennewein in St. Anton to see if they stock any of the models im interested in...

Quote:

He's a bit confused it seems


Not really mate. Im a strong, aggressive intermediate who wants a ski that will help me get a feel for powder more than a GS/SL ski would. Im no more confused than anyone else looking at mid fat skis.

Quote:

First figure out what exactly you want to ski in the near future.


Ha, what i want to ski, and what i will actually ski arent neccessarily the same thing are they? And thats the whole point of a versatile mid fat isnt it?

Cheers!!!
latest report
 You know it makes sense.
You know it makes sense.
Alexandra, fwiw I thought that was an excellent suggestion too. Smile
latest report
 Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
Valid point, but I've rarely had such horrible snow that you are restricted to 90% piste.
Anyway, you'll want a rather stiff ski, 78-82mm and ~16m turning radius probably. This should have a 75% piste 25% offpiste profile.

A great topic to get a feel on how different ski's with about the same width underfoot behave is this one: http://www.epicski.com/forum/thread/88414/2010-skis-fischer-progressor-9-dynastar-sultan-85-blizzard-8-1-max-elan-82xti (great read!) The reviewer is even the same length/weight as you.
another good review by him: http://www.epicski.com/forum/thread/89891/kastle-mx78-and-blizzard-magnum-8-1-max

ps: for full disclosure, I usually use a 82mm ski, but switch back to a 67mm SL when offpiste possibilities are minimal and groomers are crowded. (or what happens more: when the girlfriend wants a day of cruising)
snow report
 Poster: A snowHead
Poster: A snowHead
I have absolutely no faith in the whole x% groomers y% not groomed. Unless you're making 3 turns on a groomer and 1 on the boundary it's not really a relevant stat. My take on the whole mid fat thing is that they're just going to be worse than a carver on piste and worse than a 90mm waist off it. May as well go 90mm+ and just realise they won't behave like a SL ski on piste, they'll still turn like skis tend to.
snow report
 Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Hi

I have the head Monster IM78 ski's in 178, im 5'11 and 14 stone. Have no problems on piste with them and have used them in shin deep (top of the boot) powder also with out any probs, deeper POW than this and obviously a dedicated FAT pow ski would be more fun and would make life easyer. But hey these types of ski's are not made for real backcountry, more piste based and the odd excursion off piste just off the piste to shred some fresh lines when the times right after a fresh fall. and for this i find them perform faultless for this job.

Hope this helps

DJ
snow report
 Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
DaveC wrote:
May as well go 90mm+ and just realise they won't behave like a SL ski on piste, they'll still turn like skis tend to.

How is that good advice is a person knows they are going to spend more time on piste than off piste by a big margin, even if the precise percentages are a moot point? When you were looking for a relatively skinny ski for your CSIA exams did you follow that logic, when piste performance was an important issue for you?
snow report
 You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
Quote:

May as well go 90mm+ and just realise they won't behave like a SL ski on piste


Or alternatively, may as well go 75/80mm and realise they wont behave like a 100mm fatty chops off piste...?

Quote:

they'll still turn like skis tend to.


Yeah, i cant help thinking all this fuss about a few mm is "reinventing the wheel" so to speak...

Quote:

these types of ski's are not made for real backcountry, more piste based and the odd excursion off piste just off the piste to shred some fresh lines when the times right after a fresh fall


Yup thats hit the nail on the head and it seems there isnt really a bad word to say about the Monsters for this.

Vorda, thanks for the link bro, looks like Blizzard, Dynastar and Elan should be added to the list!

Cheers guys
ski holidays
 Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
rob@rar wrote:
DaveC wrote:
May as well go 90mm+ and just realise they won't behave like a SL ski on piste, they'll still turn like skis tend to.

How is that good advice is a person knows they are going to spend more time on piste than off piste by a big margin, even if the precise percentages are a moot point? When you were looking for a relatively skinny ski for your CSIA exams did you follow that logic, when piste performance was an important issue for you?


Well, I did follow that logic - still haven't figured out that one, but I know for sure it won't be >75mm. OP mentioned he's not looking for a skinny ski, my contention on the issue is that the 75-85mm ish "all mountain" skis are a bit of a dead bracket.
latest report
 You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
DaveC wrote:
my contention on the issue is that the 75-85mm ish "all mountain" skis are a bit of a dead bracket.

For a one ski quiver in typical European conditions I'd say it's a pretty useful category if you intend to mix piste and a bit of off-piste. It's the ski which I think minimises the compromises you have to make. If you're skiing what I assume to be typical Rockies powder I'd probably go 85-95 and accept that on well pisted slopes the performance would drop like a stone, but I'd probably be skiing lots more powder and variable snow.
snow conditions
 Then you can post your own questions or snow reports...
Then you can post your own questions or snow reports...
Yeah, i guess 75 - 85mm is exactly that, a comprimise, a jack of all trades and we know what is said about those!

I dunno, i lived in Innsbruck for 3 seasons and did a lot of skiing, that affords you a lot of time to go looking for powder stashes, and if i spent two hours traversing crud and windblown crust only to get lost in a forest then no big deal, id still have x weeks/months to ski....now im down to a week and a few long weekends, im not prepared to waste time looking for nice powder which is why i know ill be on piste most of the time...
snow report
 After all it is free Go on u know u want to!
After all it is free Go on u know u want to!
shiva_71, Try them before you knock them. If you want to ski more varied terrain but want to stick with a one-ski quiver then the mid-fats might suit. I do however disagree that <80mm is mid-fat (I encountered a chap last winter who tried to tell me his 72s were mid-fat). I also disagree that you can't carve/rip up the piste with them. You'll see plenty of the epicski people "ripping" the piste in 90mm plus! Perhaps it's just an EU thing to stick to skinnies... Puzzled

I also believe it's mental that you email the rental place asking if they've got x or y ski. Assess the situation when you get there - if you'll be skiing feet of powder get something really fat - don't mess around with mid-fats. I love my mid-fats for day-to-day conditions, but on a really big powder day I'd rent something fatter.
snow conditions
 You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
Last year I rented some Salomon Lords and couldn't believe how good they were on and off piste - so I bought a pair. Fall-line ski of the year last year - check out the review.
snow report
 Ski the Net with snowHeads
Ski the Net with snowHeads
Monster 82s work pretty well on and off piste. Requires good technique on piste though to work them well and short radius turns are not their strong suit. I think of them as a detuned GS ski on piste and if you can't ski on them in the back country you really shouldn't be out there. Hard to beat for a one quiver setup IMHO.
snow report



Terms and conditions  Privacy Policy