Poster: A snowHead
|
|
|
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
|
if they fit your feet, try some Garmont Shamans - a proper boot with vibram soles
I think the SMALLone said they were very similar to Nordica boots so they may be the answer
i believe the tornado pro is no stiffer than a spirit 4. i have the latter for my touring boots and they are great for that but they aren't quite a do everything boot. that said, CEM showed me some spirit 4s he was working on to beef up which looked like a pretty interesting option
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
|
Here's a similar thread
http://snowheads.com/ski-forum/viewtopic.php?t=44900&highlight=
just in case you haven't already seen them - plenty of opinions here
http://www.tetongravity.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=8
The people who tend to get away with one boot to do it all (such as meself) are light weights (less than 75 kg). I'm looking at all these new boots too as my Garmont adrenalins are 3 years old now. There doesn't appear a massive advantage for me to switch from Garmont at the moment though and I'll probably wait another year to see what the real pro/cons are after people have been using the many new AT boot offerings on the snow.
The BD's look heavy without being stiffer than other lighter AT boots. The shaman doesn't have a walk mode, might be a lot cheaper just putting a vibram sole on an alpine boot.
Last edited by Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see? on Mon 24-11-08 11:05; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
|
|
|
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
|
^^^ the Shaman does not have a walk mode. the vibram sole is rockered which makes them better for walking. skinning - they are like any other alpine boot (ie ok for a bit but not great). they aren't an AT boot but they are great if you approach them in the right way - ie a proper beefy alpine boot modified to make scrambles over rocks, snowy ridges etc a bit less heart-stopping!
as far as sticking vibram soles on alpine boots is concerned, isn't the jury still out on whether this weakens the boot structurally?
|
|
|
|
|
You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
|
Arno wrote: |
^^^ the Shaman does not have a walk mode. the vibram sole is rockered which makes them better for walking. skinning - they are like any other alpine boot (ie ok for a bit but not great). they aren't an AT boot but they are great if you approach them in the right way - ie a proper beefy alpine boot modified to make scrambles over rocks, snowy ridges etc a bit less heart-stopping!
as far as sticking vibram soles on alpine boots is concerned, isn't the jury still out on whether this weakens the boot structurally? |
As I understand it there are issues with putting a vibram sole on an alpine boot, basically any warranty on boot / bindings goes out the window. The shaman means you don't have these issues and have a rockered sole but at a price and the downhill performance may still not be as good as your preferred alpine boot. I know at least one guide who skis hundreds of days a years and has used an alpine boot & vibram sole combo for multiple years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
eng_ch,
Quote: |
Half a metre down here and seriously thinking about taking Fri off to ski
|
Where?? I could be tempted...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Powderhound, probably Flims (Laax side not open until Sat) - open, loadsa snow (see my snow report) and I have a season pass But I could be persuaded to go elsewhere
R will almost certainly be in Laax over the w/e (Fri eve onwards) as TwoLeftSkis will be over.
Would be brill if you could be tempted - I was expecting to ski alone
|
|
|
|
|
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
|
DB, I have Shamans which replaced some decent Atomic freeride boots (R11s). The Shamans are better than those - they are basically a slightly consumerised plug boot
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am watching this with great interest.
I have some Nordicas which I bought about 10 years ago, for comfort, guess what, they are now really sloppy on my feet, and hopeless in rough conditions . So I am in the market this year for some new boots. I hope this thread runs a bit as I have not got my head around all the new boots out there.
FWIW I want a boot with plenty of room in the toe box, that`s nice and stiff for downhill, but still good for doing multi day tours, Dyna fit not important and I dont expect a one boot will do everything.
I am off to Chamonix in a couple of weeks so I will be calling in the zoo.
Any suggestions.
|
|
|
|
|
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
|
Arno wrote: |
DB, I have Shamans which replaced some decent Atomic freeride boots (R11s). The Shamans are better than those - they are basically a slightly consumerised plug boot |
Must admit I didn't realize the Shamans were that well engineered but was also thinking about fit too. i.e. if your foot doesn't fit in the shamans (or other vibram soled boot) but you have an alpine boot that fits your foot well then putting a vibram sole on then is a real and cheap alternative (although as you say not without risk). Do you know if the shamans are the same 'shell fit/mould' as other Garmont boots?
this TGR thread compares the AT boot flex, suspect the BD's are around 10 less than listed
http://www.tetongravity.com/forums/showthread.php?t=78437&highlight=shaman
|
|
|
|
|
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
|
Factor is the stiffest by far.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SMALLZOOKEEPER, have you still got some?
|
|
|
|
|
You know it makes sense.
|
Re ordered this morning but i think Method would work better for you,
|
|
|
|
|
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
|
SMALLZOOKEEPER wrote: |
Factor is the stiffest by far. |
Are the Factors stiffer than the Shamans or do you mean stiffest of the AT boots wíth a walk mode? The Factors were supposed to be at least as stiff as the Shamans weren't they?
I've seen various reviews where people have debated how stiff the Factors really are. Powderhound also states this in his first post. Not sure if this is by people who have actually skied them or just flexed different AT boots in the shop. Reviews have said other lighter boots (e.g. Skookum, Endorphin, Axon) are at least as stiff as the DB Factors.
Last edited by Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name: on Mon 24-11-08 13:35; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
Poster: A snowHead
|
Powderhound, I have Garmont Mega Rides, very light, great on and off piste, not sure what the flex index is though.
|
|
|
|
|
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
|
SMALLZOOKEEPER, thanks, I think you are right, I am not a fan of super stiff boot anyway, I like a bit of ankle flex, my DH boots are 100/90 and I find them fine.
From DB`s link
"120 - Garmont Shamen*
110 - Garmont Astral*
100 - Scarpa Hurricane*, Black Diamond Factor (?)
90 - Scarpa Typhoon/Skookum, Garmont Endorphin, Garmont Axon, Dynafit Aero Freeride (4-buckle), Black Diamond Method (?)
85 - Scarpa Tornado/Pro (black tongue), Scarpa Spirit 4 (black tongue), Garmont Adrenaline, Dynafit ZZeus, Dynafit Zzero CF 4-buckle, Salomon Ellipse e2
80 - Scarpa Denali XT/TT, Scarpa Spirit 4 (green tongue), Lowa Struktura Rodeo/Pro (?), Dynafit Zzero PX 4-buckle
75 - Scarpa Spirit 3, Garmont Megaride/G-Ride, Lowa Struktura Evo, Dynafit Aero Speed (3-buckle), Dyanfit Zzero CF 3-buckle
70 - Scarpa Matrix, Old Scarpa Denali (4-buckle red shell), Dynafit TLT 700
60 - Scarpa Laser, Garmont Dynamite, Dynafit TLT 500 (2-buckle + strap), Scarpa F3
50 - Scarpa F1, Garmont Megalite, Dynafit TLT 4 Evo (3-buckle), Dynafit TLT 4 Lite (2-buckle + strap), Dynafit Zzero 2C (?)
40 - Scarpa F1 Race (2-buckle, no strap), Dynafit TLT Race Pro (1-buckle + strap)"
Are these numbers reliable, I find the fit into the binding also introduces a bit of softness.
Last edited by Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person on Mon 24-11-08 13:43; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
|
mark handford wrote: |
Powderhound, I have Garmont Mega Rides, very light, great on and off piste, not sure what the flex index is though. |
According to the link I posted earlier the flex index is around 75. A friend of mine (85kg) had a pair but changed to Endorphins which were significantly stiffer and better for him. IME which boot suits depends on the skiers weight, how aggressive they ski and how long the tours are.
|
|
|
|
|
You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
|
DB, Dude we have the lot and are fully aware of the differences. I'm sure many people that bought AT boots last year are damning the BD boots as they bought too early. The Factor is the best ski boot you CAN walk in. The Shaman isn't, to me at least in the same program, albeit, close. The Zeus second as the Method, then the rest.
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
|
SMALLZOOKEEPER wrote: |
DB, Dude we have the lot and are fully aware of the differences. I'm sure many people that bought AT boots last year are damning the BD boots as they bought too early. The Factor is the best ski boot you CAN walk in. The Shaman isn't, to me at least in the same program, albeit, close. The Zeus second as the Method, then the rest. |
The reviews all agree that the BD boots are great for walking in, that and thier dynafit compatibility probably more than offsets the increased weight. I'll have to pop down the local sports store and give the BD's a flex. Am I right in assuming the BD and Garmont AT boots have a similar volume/fit?
|
|
|
|
|
You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
|
DB, Nope, different fit, design, plastic, liners the lot. Am i still being watched? Are you reading this too? Shame on you, you are clearly sick.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: |
120 - Garmont Shamen*
110 - Garmont Astral*
100 - Scarpa Hurricane*, Black Diamond Factor (?)
90 - Scarpa Typhoon/Skookum, Garmont Endorphin, Garmont Axon, Dynafit Aero Freeride (4-buckle), Black Diamond Method (?)
85 - Scarpa Tornado/Pro (black tongue), Scarpa Spirit 4 (black tongue), Garmont Adrenaline, Dynafit ZZeus, Dynafit Zzero CF 4-buckle, Salomon Ellipse e2
80 - Scarpa Denali XT/TT, Scarpa Spirit 4 (green tongue), Lowa Struktura Rodeo/Pro (?), Dynafit Zzero PX 4-buckle
75 - Scarpa Spirit 3, Garmont Megaride/G-Ride, Lowa Struktura Evo, Dynafit Aero Speed (3-buckle), Dyanfit Zzero CF 3-buckle
70 - Scarpa Matrix, Old Scarpa Denali (4-buckle red shell), Dynafit TLT 700
60 - Scarpa Laser, Garmont Dynamite, Dynafit TLT 500 (2-buckle + strap), Scarpa F3
50 - Scarpa F1, Garmont Megalite, Dynafit TLT 4 Evo (3-buckle), Dynafit TLT 4 Lite (2-buckle + strap), Dynafit Zzero 2C (?)
40 - Scarpa F1 Race (2-buckle, no strap), Dynafit TLT Race Pro (1-buckle + strap)"
Are these numbers reliable, I find the fit into the binding also introduces a bit of softness.
|
This is nowhere near 100% correct and should therefore be treated as nonsense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SMALLZOOKEEPER, care to elaborate/correct the list then?
|
|
|
|
|
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
|
mark handford, thanks. I think my 100+ kg and aggressive skiing style will soon exceed the flex limits...
It's a shame none of these makers conform to a recognised standard terminology; and it is hard to find boots to try out through punishment. Nordica clearly don't enter the mix as far as I can tell which is a shame due to their compatible sizing.
SMALLZOOKEEPER, any thoughts on what, for who?
|
|
|
|
|
|
SMALLZOOKEEPER wrote: |
DB, Nope, different fit, design, plastic, liners the lot. Am i still being watched? Are you reading this too? Shame on you, you are clearly sick. |
Are you trying to tease me with your technical know-how, shame on you.
|
|
|
|
|
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
|
SMALLZOOKEEPER wrote: |
Quote: |
120 - Garmont Shamen*
110 - Garmont Astral*
100 - Scarpa Hurricane*, Black Diamond Factor (?)
90 - Scarpa Typhoon/Skookum, Garmont Endorphin, Garmont Axon, Dynafit Aero Freeride (4-buckle), Black Diamond Method (?)
85 - Scarpa Tornado/Pro (black tongue), Scarpa Spirit 4 (black tongue), Garmont Adrenaline, Dynafit ZZeus, Dynafit Zzero CF 4-buckle, Salomon Ellipse e2
80 - Scarpa Denali XT/TT, Scarpa Spirit 4 (green tongue), Lowa Struktura Rodeo/Pro (?), Dynafit Zzero PX 4-buckle
75 - Scarpa Spirit 3, Garmont Megaride/G-Ride, Lowa Struktura Evo, Dynafit Aero Speed (3-buckle), Dyanfit Zzero CF 3-buckle
70 - Scarpa Matrix, Old Scarpa Denali (4-buckle red shell), Dynafit TLT 700
60 - Scarpa Laser, Garmont Dynamite, Dynafit TLT 500 (2-buckle + strap), Scarpa F3
50 - Scarpa F1, Garmont Megalite, Dynafit TLT 4 Evo (3-buckle), Dynafit TLT 4 Lite (2-buckle + strap), Dynafit Zzero 2C (?)
40 - Scarpa F1 Race (2-buckle, no strap), Dynafit TLT Race Pro (1-buckle + strap)"
Are these numbers reliable, I find the fit into the binding also introduces a bit of softness.
|
This is nowhere near 100% correct and should therefore be treated as nonsense. |
Is bootfitting a precise science that is always 100% correct? If not should it all be discarded?
As I understand it the list was generated from the views of many skiers who ski such boots and it's open to public debate. The list has been amended to incorporate many views - it never made out it was 100% correct. It's aim is to give punters a clearer idea of how the boots compare - something the ski/bootfitting industry has failed to do.
|
|
|
|
|
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
|
DB,
Quote: |
Is bootfitting a precise science that is always 100% correct? If not should it all be discarded?
|
bit defensive.... Did you compile the list by any chance!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Powderhound wrote: |
DB,
Quote: |
Is bootfitting a precise science that is always 100% correct? If not should it all be discarded?
|
bit defensive.... Did you compile the list by any chance! |
No I didn't and am not the author of the thread.
If you look further than the list and deeper into the whole thread you can see that it was a group effort as opposed to a single person's opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
You know it makes sense.
|
the thread DB quotes doesn't claim to be definitive - it's probably a consensus
also, they take some random Salomon boot as "par" (IIRC) so the numbers probably deviate from the official flex numbers. probably best to read it as a ranking of stiffness (ie you can conclude that a Scarpa Matrix is stiffer than a Scarpa Laser, although the numbers attributed to them should be taken with a pinch of salt)
|
|
|
|
|
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
|
|
|
Poster: A snowHead
|
eng_ch Nope to much detail required.
DB, I have read that thread, the problem is that there are too many variables to have this work on any level.
No bootfitting shouldn't be disregarded IMO because it's a personal service based on establishing as many constants that is possible to achieve a best result. These kind of charts confuse and mislead dude.
|
|
|
|
|
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
|
SMALLZOOKEEPER, Any thoughts on Scarpa's Terminator X Pro . . . ?
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
|
hello;
very interested in this thread.
Me-
wt; 85-88kg (should be much lighter but laziness beer, pizza, TV, a wife 2 kids , another on the way and the sofa have taken their toll)
ski; quite fast (ie not many people will pass me on piste reasonable off piste) not that fit but can ski fast all day- it's just the walking up that is a pain.
feet; euro 42 (UK old boots rossignol freeride xx mondo 26.5 very very tight banged toes on even the smallest jump, agony across mid foot ill blown out- then still tight, agony if walking or worse skinning- ok/good skiing- good control (finally thrown in skip in Zermatt this May). Toes not long, Wide across metatarsal heads (at least 98mm), highish arch, narrow heel. Also have Scarpa TX2 tele boots- at mondo 27.5 also a bit painful across midfoot but no toe abuse.
Want; a stiffish AT/freeide boot that fits- good for skiinh on and off piste- a bit of skinning (max 3hrs) but not mutltiday tours. Ideally fit any old binding 9think only dynafit have a boot).
Also will dynafit bindings do me? (their beefiest binding)???
thanks in advance
any ideas?
any idea
|
|
|
|
|
You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
|
SMALLZOOKEEPER wrote: |
eng_ch Nope to much detail required.
DB, I have read that thread, the problem is that there are too many variables to have this work on any level.
No bootfitting shouldn't be disregarded IMO because it's a personal service based on establishing as many constants that is possible to achieve a best result. These kind of charts confuse and mislead dude. |
All in your opinion, if you aren't prepared to put up some better info then I suggest you stop calling other peoples info cr@p. If the list is bad prove it but save me this grasshopper stuff, it's not exactly brain surgery and you're not the only one who can fit a ski boot.
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
|
edsilva, dynafit now do a DIN 12 so unless you are jumping off things a lot or really banging it through moguls it will probably be OK
|
|
|
|
|
You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
|
I think SMALLZOOKEEPER, has a point, the whole things a system. The skis, bindings and the boots, and it all adds up. If the boots are top of the range stiff as hell, but they are poorly fitted ie too big its slack in the system, same with the bindings if the boots are even slightly loose in the binding, its more slack etc. All the slack = loss of precision and drive.
I however do think for us punters its nice to have some reference points to judge what we are buying, not that many "bootfitters" have the same level of integrity as the Zoo keepers. I was sent away with a free adjustment by the Large one a couple of years back when I had gone in thinking I needed new downhill boots. Its a world of difference from the chancers on commission.
Seeing all the boots listed has certainly helped me get my head around it. I did not think for a minute that the ratings were accurate or could be mapped to alpine boots, even the rating of Alpine boots are all over the place between makers. Just as a ranking its helpful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
jbob wrote: |
I think SMALLZOOKEEPER, has a point, the whole things a system. The skis, bindings and the boots, and it all adds up. If the boots are top of the range stiff as hell, but they are poorly fitted ie too big its slack in the system, same with the bindings if the boots are even slightly loose in the binding, its more slack etc. All the slack = lose of precision and drive. |
This is true, but I think if you've reached the stage of looking at AT boots, you've probably got the experience to realise this and take it into account with any other information obtained. Is it not at least possible to indicate within one manufacturer which models are stiffer/softer than other models? Comparisons between manufacturers are possibly more difficult.
I think we're all old enough and ugly enough to work on UCA and if you're going to say that some available information is worthless, then I think it is a rather pointless posting to say so but refuse to indicate, in broad terms, in what respect the information is defective. We're trying to be informed consumers here, you know
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
|
I'm not trying to say that i am the only BF to see here, simply that the information is misleading and may make more work than is needed by omitting certain models that may well work. The list provided may well help as a guide but the figures quoted are subject to other factors that i believe have not been factored into this study. I don't have the time to go into this in any depth as we are busy explaining to our customers why this list is wrong face to face.
Bootfitting is not a straight forward science and you will find many that are excellent across the Alps and further a field.
DB, Wind your neck in dude, i simply wish to point out the list has more work to be done if the figures quoted are to represent the real data.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I tried on some ZZeus, Factors & Radiums last week. My god they're soft, be interesting to see how that translates in the snow
|
|
|
|
|
|