Can you get an idea of how good someone is just by reading their posts? |
Yes |
|
41% |
[ 20 ] |
No |
|
39% |
[ 19 ] |
Don't Know |
|
18% |
[ 9 ] |
|
Voted : 48 |
Total Votes : 48 |
|
|
|
Poster: A snowHead
|
|
|
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
|
|
|
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
|
Now that we are on the rob@rar.org.uk, appreciation thread, I think he has a beautiful smooth, gliding, carve.
|
|
|
|
|
You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
|
Frosty the Snowman wrote: |
Now that we are on the rob@rar.org.uk, appreciation thread, I think he has a beautiful smooth, gliding, carve. |
I see him ski a lot, and I can assure you that he does this:
rather often!
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
|
rob@rar.org.uk wrote: |
JimW, that's kind of you to say so; I'll try not to hide my light quite so far under the bushel in future One of the reasons I don't think of myself as a good skier is that I get quite intimidated by the level of expertise on display here, and for fear of embarrassing myself when I actually ski with fellow snowHeads I try not to 'over-claim' my ability. |
Good point. I think there is a competence - confidence - complacency curve. For me there is a big difference between rationally thinking I'm competent to ski a particular piste/pitch whatever and being confident about doing so. I therefore find it very difficult to have a realistic idea of my ability and when I gain some confidence I often experience pride coming before a fall - a shift into complacency can knock me right back again.
|
|
|
|
|
You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
|
David Murdoch wrote: |
agavin, I think you're about spot on. Although I am now rather conscious about spinning too many yarns... |
Don't worry ... I saw your video clip of you zip lining those moguls ... you have a lot of snow cred in my book ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
A few thoughts on the original question.
Firstly I think it depends quite a bit on someone’s posting frequency and on what topics they post.
I suspect it would be pretty difficult to read much into twenty posts on word association.
I doubt anyone is intentionally dishonest so you can always look at their ski profile if posted and I suspect that anyone who regularly does the Inferno, Meije Derby or whatever is going to be pretty damn good skier.
Does it matter? I don’t think a pecking order is of any great importance but I do think it can be useful to accurate communication if considering new areas etc.
If someone’s interest lies in cruising blues and reds their opinions on the ski area may be different form my own. Equally if someone is skiing couloirs and steep stuff my opinions on the off piste are likely to be of little help to them.
It is probably also pretty essential if a small group of snow heads are planning trips together a large group can divide but noone really wants to ski a full holiday holding up others and struggling or waiting the whole time when they want to be ripping it.
I guess you form a mental impression of how some sH’s ski but how accurately I don’t know. How accurate were the impressions of those who went to the EOSB ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
parlorD wrote: |
There are defiantly tell tale signs as to whether a poster is a good skier or not. My own guide is:
1) They never ski indoors
|
Got me
|
|
|
|
|
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
|
|
|
|
Wear The Fox Hat wrote: |
DM, yes this is a non-painful thread (so far). Now, about meeting for beers/Jagers/Pastis/... in Chamonix...
(I'm not an "expert" drinker, but I am a reasonably knowledgeable one - want to see a video? ) |
I asked around, and found the video...
EpicSki Thread about it
The video
|
|
|
|
|
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
|
Peter Leuzzi, Hi Peter, no the initials are P.B. (it's on Paul Street). The critical difference is in the description "full contact". I think it's about as close as I can get to any female other than Sophie without running a high risk of being "Bobbitted".
I'm certainly not suggesting people don't post whatever they want - I mean pity the fool who started this daft thread!
|
|
|
|
|
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
|
David Murdoch,
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Murdoch, so you wont be needing loose change to throw into a pint glass then?
|
|
|
|
|
You know it makes sense.
|
|
|
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
|
Quote: |
our own perceptions are so often wide of the mark
|
Last year I felt on a particular day like I was skiing well beyond what I ever hoped. My wife took photos on a cheapy disposable camera. When the photos came back weeks later I snapped at her for taking photos of the wrong person..... until I realised I was the only person on that piste at that time!
|
|
|
|
|
Poster: A snowHead
|
I think most people have different definitions of the word "good" in relation to skiing to start with. Most Snowheads are enthusiastic, even quite serious about their skiing. After all, no-one would waste their time on an internet forum if they weren't, would they?
I don't think you can ever be sure until you see someone ski, but anyone who talks about the colour of runs as an important thing, or thinks speed is important per se would definitely suggest to me that they weren't much good - no matter how many long technobabble words they use. (Actually I despise technobabble, but most of you already know that.
|
|
|
|
|
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
|
easiski,
yeah - I have been fooled re T-bar riding a few times... for years we tried to ensure I rode with those that balanced well themselves - as i was likely to complicate the issuea at worst and at best be unable to help them at all.... So the lifties all tried to help me find the folks that could ride... ditto I would try to find useful folks in the queue... (patrol were always a good bet as were the lift supers that i KNEW and off duty instructors)... Sometimes I could pick by the look on the face when i said i had balance problems.... others would look cool and say "I'll help you - that's fine" The clothes skis etc were no help but the look on face was quite a good indication... or so i thought...
I got one who was going to "save me" no worries - he could barely stand up on the flat part!.... the steeper section was a nightmare... kept trying to go sideways off the track(on my side) ... it was all I could do to steer the other way... at the top he tells me "oh that is steep compared to xxx isn't it?" xxx being the t-bar they use to teach t-bar riding and the one we were on the steepest/rockiest bit you could find....
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
|
IMVHO, those that can do, those that can't talk or type about it.
|
|
|
|
|
You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
|
|
|
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
|
rob@rar.org.uk, 'twas George Adam. Here's another small clip (2Mb) - do you recognise him?
|
|
|
|
|
You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
|
|
|
|
Yoda wrote: |
rob@rar.org.uk, 'twas George Adam. Here's another small clip (2Mb) - do you recognise him? |
He reminds me of an instructor who did a couple of seasons with Masterclass in Courchevel (now Ski Supreme) about 12 years ago. I can't remember the guy's name from back then, so it might be him or it might not be. The sense of humour is very similar! Thanks for digging out that extra clip.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|