Poster: A snowHead
|
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-49820542
Not new news per se, but just reading the scale of how much (& fast) it's receding is very sobering.. Was talking to my wife about it (after the post on the PSB regarding the Tignes glacier not opening for its autumn skiing), then realised with me jetsetting over there a couple times a year - I'm not helping either. Conflicted feelings... I've found a sport a thoroughly enjoy, yet in part, am contributing to factors which are affecting my ability to do it!
|
|
|
|
|
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
|
|
|
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
|
marksymoo wrote: |
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-49820542
Not new news per se, but just reading the scale of how much (& fast) it's receding is very sobering.. Was talking to my wife about it (after the post on the PSB regarding the Tignes glacier not opening for its autumn skiing), then realised with me jetsetting over there a couple times a year - I'm not helping either. Conflicted feelings... I've found a sport a thoroughly enjoy, yet in part, am contributing to factors which are affecting my ability to do it! |
Going by train massively reduces your carbon footprint.
|
|
|
|
|
You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
|
Compared with flying? Do you have figures?
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
|
|
|
You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
|
Flying has 6-7 times the carbon footprint of travelling by train
Take a look at www.skiflightfree.org - I can supply you with data for all resorts if you want (for comparison of train v plane v car)
|
|
|
|
|
|
When you think of the energy required to get an aircraft weighing 80 tons up to 30,000 feet in often strong headwinds compared to moving an (albeit heavy) train, across a flat low resistance surface.....logic suggests that the latter will need a lot less energy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
|
and once you get there on your eco train somewhere like Val d'Isere the lifts and snow canons use 16 GWH of electricity and the snow canons 750,000 m3 of water. That's not counting the diesel for piste bashers etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: |
and once you get there on your eco train somewhere like Val d'Isere the lifts and snow canons use 16 GWH of electricity and the snow canons 750,000 m3 of water. That's not counting the diesel for piste bashers etc.
|
Exactly. Resort skiing is not an eco-friendly activity. I'm getting tired of skiers (particularly pro skiers, who spend their time flying around the world, heliskiing, and promoting products that most people will buy to only wear/use a couple of times) telling me to reduce my carbon footprint. There's a lot of virtue signalling and hypocrisy.
|
|
|
|
|
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
|
I'll give up taking flights when Harry and Megan do the same.
|
|
|
|
|
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
|
Plant a tree.
|
|
|
|
|
|
iainm wrote: |
Flying has 6-7 times the carbon footprint of travelling by train
Take a look at www.skiflightfree.org - I can supply you with data for all resorts if you want (for comparison of train v plane v car) |
Thank you. I tend to drive, in a new car with 4 passengers, so hopefully all good.
|
|
|
|
|
|