Poster: A snowHead
|
Volkl have just replied to a message I sent them on FB messenger, about the base settings on my particular skis. Oh and yes I now know they've been on the Piste Office site.
Well they came back with 1.4 and 87.6 so that is being precise and too precise for me. I think I'll stick to 1 and 2
|
|
|
|
|
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
|
1 and 2 is my setting for everything and works well for general use.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
|
1:3
|
|
|
|
|
You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
|
@FrequentFaller, I'm surprised they could be that precise, taking into account manufacturing tolerances...
1:3 for me as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
|
Yep, current Völkl’s are 1.4 base bevel and 2.4 side bevel whereas previous models have been 1:2.
|
|
|
|
|
You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
|
This afternoon I've mounted a pair of Katana V-Werks and 90Eights and set up the rail bindings on a pair of Code L Pro's. All brand new out of the wrapper for a factory sponsored skier and all have edges that are bang on 1,2. And yes, I have kit that can measure to a tenth of a degree.
A 1.4 base edge angle is too 'loose'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
So it looks like the people at Volkl who handle the FB enquiries are not being briefed correctly..
|
|
|
|
|
|
FrequentFaller wrote: |
So it looks like the people at Volkl who handle the FB enquiries are not being briefed correctly.. |
If the 1.4,2.4 is correct then nobody has told the Chinese
|
|
|
|
|
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
|
I'd be upset to find that volkl's were made in China..
|
|
|
|
|
|
It would seem a bit odd for the factory to put a 1.4 base bevel on a brand new ski as it doesn't give a ski tuner any room to play with. I don't know if they still do, but Head often used to supply skis with a 0.5 base bevel, so it was easy to tune to your personal preference if you wanted a little more bevel. That makes more sense to me.
|
|
|
|
|
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
|
|
|
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
|
1:3 for me as well
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'd be more inclined to believe @spyderjon, having bought 2 pairs of skis, niether of which had the angles the manufactures claimed (they're both set to 1+3 now)
@Scarlet, 1.4 isn't actually more precise than 1.
|
|
|
|
|
You know it makes sense.
|
@adithorp, Defining to 0.1 degrees rather than 1 degree, no?
|
|
|
|
|
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
|
Scarlet wrote: |
@adithorp, Defining to 0.1 degrees rather than 1 degree, no? |
I certainly wouldn't buy a pair of skis from a manufacturer that had a manufacturing tolerance of 1 deg! I would expect them to be within a tenth of a degree of what the nominal value was supposed to be. 1.4 is a very odd baseline though as most tuning guides come in 0.5 or 0.25 deg increments. For example I own 0.5 and 1.0 deg base edge guides, so I would never be able to maintain a 1.4 deg base edge anyway. I could buy a 1.5 deg guide, which would be near enough, but I've never had such a "loose" base edge before.
|
|
|
|
|
Poster: A snowHead
|
@Scarlet, if no tolerance is stated then 1deg is 1deg. Is 1deg different than 1.0deg?
|
|
|
|
|
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
|
@adithorp, I guess what I was thinking is that if you state to 1dp then you are saying that you can measure accurately to that. If you only ever quote whole figures, then how am I supposed to know how accurate that is? But saying that, I don't work in manufacturing, don't set up machinery for accuracy, and work to tolerances of 3-5mm which relative to setting edge angles of fractions of a degree, is massively inaccurate
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
|
@Scarlet, a manufacturing tolerance of 0.1 deg is actually very easy to achieve on a metal edge. I would consider that a pretty loose tolerance actually. But why Volkl allegedly chose 1.4 deg as their standard base angle is a mystery to me.
|
|
|
|
|
|