 Poster: A snowHead
|
Just a reminder to use your vote on the proposed new A of A before end of Thursday, log in to your members area and follow the instructions on how to vote online. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
|
|
I voted against the proposed Articles of Association.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
|
|
@rob@rar, I also voted against them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
|
Link /topic????? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
|
|
@rob@rar, @sarah, me too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
|
|
Proposed A of A not carried today.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@laundryman, did you attend?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@sarah, no (not a member), but I've just been speaking with a man who did.
|
|
|
|
|
|
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
|
| laundryman wrote: |
| Proposed A of A not carried today. |
Good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What was wrong with them? (Sorry, that's probably a stupid question.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
|
|
@Hurtle, I'm probably not the best person to answer, but wholesale changes have been promoted on the basis of modernisation, without any specifics as to why any individual change is necessary. Others have said that the changes tend to increase the power of the board and executive at the expense of the membership and/or that the changes are intended to legitimise past or current practices that break the existing articles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
|
@laundryman,
| Quote: |
Others have said that the changes tend to increase the power of the board and executive at the expense of the membership and/or that the changes are intended to legitimise past or current practices that break the existing articles.
|
I bet they have 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What now?
|
|
|
|
|
|
You know it makes sense.
|
| Hurtle wrote: |
| What was wrong with them? |
Just about everything.
The proposed A o A would have given the Board power to do anything they wanted without recourse to the membership.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
|
| stewart woodward wrote: |
| Hurtle wrote: |
| What was wrong with them? |
Just about everything.
The proposed A o A would have given the Board power to do anything they wanted without recourse to the membership. |
Not the best thing to do with an impending court case. Just who are the board getting advice from ? Even Wile E. Coyote was not that self destructive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
