Poster: A snowHead
|
dg3, another vote for the free weights. Also try and do them in unstable positions as well, great for the core.
|
|
|
|
|
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
|
|
|
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
|
as I get closer to racing this season (Eurotest attempt II - another story!) I'm going to build in explosive plymetric type squats to training - hadn't heard of unstable position thing Kramer - could you clarify, sounds interesting.
and DG Orf sounds like if you keep hitting the leg press machine like that, you'll only be able to sport Golds Gym type animal print baggy elasticated trousers in neon green, with leather bumbag slung round the front for your beer money - careful man
|
|
|
|
|
You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
|
Kramer wrote: |
dg3, another vote for the free weights. Also try and do them in unstable positions as well, great for the core. |
absolutely, free weights done on a bosu or kneeling/lying on a swiss ball are so effective
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
|
Following up on the discusion of free weights V machines... the good thing about machines is that they isolate the movement and the bad thing about machines is that they isolate the movement.
It's a good thing when you really want to focus on a specific muscle or two and it guides you through the movement so it's great for novices as it reduces the risk they'll injure themselves by doing the movement wrong. But, the downside is that in most sports where you apply the movement you've practised on a machine it is not so isolated. Take a look here at an overview of how different muscles are involved in even simple movements: http://www.cmcrossroads.com/bradapp/docs/rec/stretching/stretching_2.html#SEC11.
What this means is that if you develop the strength of a muscle but without training your central nervous system to control the supporting muscles you may injure yourself by making another part of your body the weakest link, for example leg press to increase your leg strength, but if you do a squating type movement you also need you core (ab and back) muscles to stablise you.
So it's a good idea to do a combination of free weights and machines. And also to vary the movements so you continue to challenge your muscles, for example bench press - wide grip, narrow grip, incline, flat, decline, barbells, dumbbells etc.
If you haven't used free weights before ask an instructor to show you, don't just copy what you see others doing as you may just be copying their bad technique. There is an increased risk of injury using free weights, but only if you have bad technique.
|
|
|
|
|
You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
|
zebedee, wise words.
|
|
|
|
|
|
dg3, basically if you're used to doing an exercise sitting then do it standing or sat on a swiss ball, if you're used to doing it standing then do it on a bosu, or standing on one leg, or even standing on one leg on a bosu. It makes exercises far more difficult for any given weight, and I think it's a useful variation.
zebedee, I'm a big fan of functional movements as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
dg3, I will admit to having a quiet laugh at some of the other chaps in the gym, they look the part with their sculpted biceps etc but in many cases I with my hardly visable biceps can actually lift more and do more reps, as I understand it there is a difference between those that compete in bodybuilding events and those that simply are trying to tone the muscles, despite the apparently high loads I use on the leg press it would appear that this is only toning the muscle and not bulking it out, if I want to bulk my legs out I'd need to go to the free weights gym and use 350Kg or more on their leg press something I only do rarely
|
|
|
|
|
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
|
|
|
|
little tiger, Kramer, Thanks Guys - v.helpful.
|
|
|
|
|
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
|
One good core squat test - but make sure that you actually really can do it! Make free weight deep squats on top of a bosu ball (the half of it with platform that is). Incredibly difficult, no need fo great weight, but forces you to use every bit of your legs and abs + back to stay on top.
|
|
|
|
|
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
|
demos, there might be a point, depending on whether you believe in this study:
Quote: |
Br J Sports Med. 2002 Oct;36(5):370-3; discussion 374.Click here to read Links
Fatigue is not a necessary stimulus for strength gains during resistance training.
Folland JP, Irish CS, Roberts JC, Tarr JE, Jones DA.
Chelsea School Research Centre, University of Brighton, Eastbourne, UK. j.folland@bton.ac.uk
BACKGROUND: High resistance training enhances muscular strength, and recent work has suggested an important role for metabolite accumulation in this process. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of fatigue and metabolite accumulation in strength gains by comparing highly fatiguing and non-fatiguing isotonic training protocols. METHODS: Twenty three healthy adults (18-29 years of age; eight women) were assigned to either a high fatigue protocol (HF: four sets of 10 repetitions with 30 seconds rest between sets) to maximise metabolic stress or a low fatigue protocol (LF: 40 repetitions with 30 seconds between each repetition) to minimise changes. Subjects lifted on average 73% of their 1 repetition maximum through the full range of knee extension with both legs, three times a week. Quadriceps isometric strength of each leg was measured at a knee joint angle of 1.57 rad (90 degrees ), and a Cybex 340 isokinetic dynamometer was used to measure the angle-torque and torque-velocity relations of the non-dominant leg. RESULTS: At the mid-point of the training, the HF group had 50% greater gains in isometric strength, although this was not significant (4.5 weeks: HF, 13.3 (4.4)%; LF, 8.9 (3.6)%). This rate of increase was not sustained by the HF group, and after nine weeks of training all the strength measurements showed similar improvements for both groups (isometric strength: HF, 18.2 (3.9)%; LF, 14.5 (4.0)%). The strength gains were limited to the longer muscle lengths despite training over the full range of movement. CONCLUSIONS: Fatigue and metabolite accumulation do not appear to be critical stimuli for strength gain, and resistance training can be effective without the severe discomfort and acute physical effort associated with fatiguing contractions.
PMID: 12351337 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
comprex, the study on isometric strength seems to contradict at least what to me seems common sense, i.e. isometric training and fatigue would improve resistance and maximise isometric strength. What can I say... No pain does not equal no gain? What have I done all these years...
|
|
|
|
|
You know it makes sense.
|
demos, I think it's cause and effect - lifting a heavy weight for 8 reps will cause fatigue, but it's not the fatigue that stimulates your muscle to grow - it was the load that you placed on the muscle by lifting the heavy weight. That's why a lighter weight for 30 reps might fatique the muscle but won't do much for increasing your strength, just endurance.
What this means in practice is that if you plan to lift 8 reps, then doing one or two more until you can't continue probably won't make much difference. However, you could take that as a sign that you were capable of lifting a heavier weight and then next time you increase the weight you use.
The other thing that goes along with this is muscle soreness, again it's something that people use to measure how good their workout was "I could hardly walk for 3 days, what a great workout!", but this isn't necessary for muscle growth.
BTW - the study mentioned above involved movements through a full range of motion, they just used isometric contractions as a way of measuring strength.
|
|
|
|
|
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
|
|
|
Poster: A snowHead
|
demos,
Quote: |
What have I done all these years... |
, as far as I can make out, bought time with fatigue
4x10 = 120-160 seconds + 90 seconds rest = somewhere around 4 minutes total
40x1= 40x33seconds= somewhere around 22 to 23 minutes.
|
|
|
|
|
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
|
Its all well and good talking about technique and theory, but the lets not forget the most important part of going to the gym is what you do in the kitchen. Also, have a look for Chad Waterbury he has loads of detailed regimes on testosterone nation. I found 5x5 working around a push pull legs routine to be extremely rewarding, however your CNS will be annihilated for the first 2 weeks
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
|
Kramer wrote: |
dg3, basically if you're used to doing an exercise sitting then do it standing or sat on a swiss ball, if you're used to doing it standing then do it on a bosu, or standing on one leg, or even standing on one leg on a bosu. It makes exercises far more difficult for any given weight, and I think it's a useful variation.
zebedee, I'm a big fan of functional movements as well. |
Yup - just try doing presses with dumbells laying on top of a ball... doesn't half bring those stablising muscles into play.
|
|
|
|
|
You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
|
D G Orf,
That's a frightening amount of weight. How tall are you? I have 23" thighs and am 5'9" and do no weight training at all. Even when I get to the gym (which is seldom) I do upper body and core stuff because they are so relatively weedy compared to my legs.
I do cycle a lot and run a bit but most of my leg muscle is just genetic. Despite the chunk legs I'd not be on the same planet as you in terms of strength. How do you think leg press compares to cycling as conditioning for skiing? I'd have thought cycling was more similar unless you are dealing with the huge loads involved in downhill racing?
Cheers,
J
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
|
Scarpa wrote: |
Yup - just try doing presses with dumbells laying on top of a ball... doesn't half bring those stablising muscles into play. |
Or try it with your hands either side of an upturned half bosu and your feet on a full ball, hours of fun for the whole family.
|
|
|
|
|
You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
|
jedster, just over 6 ft tall, 26" Thighs 18-19" Calfs
I think you can get a very similar movement on the leg press to that of the classic downhill crouch position, if you do the stupid number of reps that I sometimes do then I think its very similar to skiing loads, however the cycling is probably just as effective and a lot less work
|
|
|
|
|
|
D G Orf, Or - (and I have never attempted this) - pick a steep rocky gully and jump up it. Now that will build stamina
|
|
|
|
|
|
For training 'fast twitch' muscle try spring jumps onto a picnic bench, really helps in knee deep powder
|
|
|
|
|
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
|
|
|
|
comprex, Depends how steep the powder is... if you have to do big jump turns then it may be handy, plus many skiers already have a lot of slow fibres well recruited.
|
|
|
|
|
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
|
Scarpa, I could argue that on two points:
powder doesn't stick very well to truly steep slopes, unless perhaps in a maritime environment (Alaska, Sochi?)
doing big jump turns misses the point of the powder turn (unhurried floatation without sudden changes, hence near-weightlessness) and essentially wastes snow, both as a missed opportunity and as a chance to cause a slide with the slough
but there's really no point in further derailment of the thread.
|
|
|
|
|
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
|
comprex, Agree with you there actually. Was just thinking aloud.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mosha Marc wrote: |
Scarpa wrote: |
Yup - just try doing presses with dumbells laying on top of a ball... doesn't half bring those stablising muscles into play. |
Or try it with your hands either side of an upturned half bosu and your feet on a full ball, hours of fun for the whole family. |
Or feet on one ball, hands on another?
|
|
|
|
|
You know it makes sense.
|
Jonpim wrote: |
Why not do something useful? |
'Coz powerlifters can dunk a basketball AND punch out the useful work nancy?
|
|
|
|
|
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
|
dg3, Are you going to either of the Alpe D'Huez Eurotests? I'm allowed leave of my fartherly duties just long enough to attend one this season and would be looking to hook up with others to run some gates during the week of the Dec or Jan test.
|
|
|
|
|
Poster: A snowHead
|
balernoStu, pm sent
|
|
|
|
|
|